Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Which are the richest and poorest ACC football programs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 557648" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>I would also question the data being used as a per sport revenue indicator. The data probably is a "fair snapshot of the financial picture of the school", but does each school split the revenue in the same way? The payout from the ACC was $25-30 million. Wake Forest shows football and basketball combined to be $27 million, other sports to be $16 million, and non-sport specific to be $17.5 million. Clemson shows football and basketball to be $64 million, other sports to be $10 million, and non-sport specific to be $37 million. GT shows football and basketball to be $60 million, other sports to be $2 million, and non-sport specific to be $16 million. </p><p></p><p>The EADA guidelines, at least what I read of them do not specify how to split revenues. It is likely that the data is not an accurate representation of the schools revenue on a per-sport basis.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 557648, member: 2426"] I would also question the data being used as a per sport revenue indicator. The data probably is a "fair snapshot of the financial picture of the school", but does each school split the revenue in the same way? The payout from the ACC was $25-30 million. Wake Forest shows football and basketball combined to be $27 million, other sports to be $16 million, and non-sport specific to be $17.5 million. Clemson shows football and basketball to be $64 million, other sports to be $10 million, and non-sport specific to be $37 million. GT shows football and basketball to be $60 million, other sports to be $2 million, and non-sport specific to be $16 million. The EADA guidelines, at least what I read of them do not specify how to split revenues. It is likely that the data is not an accurate representation of the schools revenue on a per-sport basis. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Which are the richest and poorest ACC football programs?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top