Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Virginia Postgame
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CuseJacket" data-source="post: 657960" data-attributes="member: 274"><p>This was my explanation for how poorly the last 27 seconds was handled. All coaching. All in our control.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://gtswarm.com/threads/set-the-clock-to-13-seconds-and-restart-at-ready-for-play.19291/page-4#post-628699" target="_blank">https://gtswarm.com/threads/set-the-clock-to-13-seconds-and-restart-at-ready-for-play.19291/page-4#post-628699</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>This soundbite exacerbates how poorly we handled the last 27 seconds. The "sudden change" or "situational awareness" that was praised last week, was turned on its head this week, and it almost entirely points to coaching.</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Decision to spike the ball</strong> - Tobias had to look to the sidelines for instruction. Coaches responded by signaling the spike. You can debate whether spiking and forfeiting 1 of our 3 attempts at a TD, and it would be a conversation by itself imo, if it weren't for the more egregious decisions that followed. There's something here, imo.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Snap infraction</strong> - First, it took us 4 seconds from a stopped clock to hike the ball to spike. That's problem #1. Problem #2 is the snap infraction i.e., players were not prepared for the situation.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>See [USER=355]@DenverJacket56[/USER]'s post below. 10 second runoff vs. taking a timeout. </strong>I mean, you almost have to try to be unprepared for that situation as a coach. It has been a rule long enough, and apparently the decision was made to sacrifice 10 seconds i.e., at least 1 attempt to the end zone, in order to preserve a timeout that we might not need. Basically, we decided to forfeit 1st down with a spike, and 2nd down with the 10 seconds runoff.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Misunderstanding that the clock will start at "ready for play" vs "on the snap".</strong> Realllly bad look by Collins now in hindsight based on the postgame press conference. Needs to do a lot of damage control because this, compounded with the aforementioned, is nothing short of an indictment of coaching preparedness. For all the talk about situational awareness, we had a coaching staff with years of experience that either did not handle the pressure, or at best didn't prioritize one of the most critical aspects of their job.</li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CuseJacket, post: 657960, member: 274"] This was my explanation for how poorly the last 27 seconds was handled. All coaching. All in our control. [URL]https://gtswarm.com/threads/set-the-clock-to-13-seconds-and-restart-at-ready-for-play.19291/page-4#post-628699[/URL] This soundbite exacerbates how poorly we handled the last 27 seconds. The "sudden change" or "situational awareness" that was praised last week, was turned on its head this week, and it almost entirely points to coaching. [LIST=1] [*][B]Decision to spike the ball[/B] - Tobias had to look to the sidelines for instruction. Coaches responded by signaling the spike. You can debate whether spiking and forfeiting 1 of our 3 attempts at a TD, and it would be a conversation by itself imo, if it weren't for the more egregious decisions that followed. There's something here, imo. [*][B]Snap infraction[/B] - First, it took us 4 seconds from a stopped clock to hike the ball to spike. That's problem #1. Problem #2 is the snap infraction i.e., players were not prepared for the situation. [*][B]See [USER=355]@DenverJacket56[/USER]'s post below. 10 second runoff vs. taking a timeout. [/B]I mean, you almost have to try to be unprepared for that situation as a coach. It has been a rule long enough, and apparently the decision was made to sacrifice 10 seconds i.e., at least 1 attempt to the end zone, in order to preserve a timeout that we might not need. Basically, we decided to forfeit 1st down with a spike, and 2nd down with the 10 seconds runoff. [*][B]Misunderstanding that the clock will start at "ready for play" vs "on the snap".[/B] Realllly bad look by Collins now in hindsight based on the postgame press conference. Needs to do a lot of damage control because this, compounded with the aforementioned, is nothing short of an indictment of coaching preparedness. For all the talk about situational awareness, we had a coaching staff with years of experience that either did not handle the pressure, or at best didn't prioritize one of the most critical aspects of their job. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Virginia Postgame
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top