You do have to find out about other guys. You put them in when we have 6 or 8 run leads like we had in the other two games. No need to use your trusted and better pitchers then.
I am guessing Hall thought Marshall had run out of good pitching by Game 4 and he expected us to explode offensively. He gambled, and lost. This RPI loss could easily haunt us when tourney time comes.
You makwe sure you WIN these games first and foremost. THEN (and only then) do you give your other arms some time on the mound.
Then when they come into a close game with no experience in that situation and fail, you'd be like "Why haven't we gotten these guys any experience in these situations?" They have to get out there in those spots at some point. I'd rather they pop their cherry against Marshall than UVA or Clemson.
Again, Payden has been good early on (in TWO APPEARANCES - his first two game appearances on a diamond in two years nonetheless), but he's not Mariano Rivera. Hernandez is going to be a key piece in the pen and was about as dominant as Paden in his prior innings. Going in, they had 1 and 2 appearances apiece. For all you know, they're both in a competition to be closer and it was Hernandez's turn. Other than Tate I think every pitching role is pretty fluid right now. We're trying to figure out what we have. Both of those guys are going to be important to our success. Had Payden been in and gotten hit, what would you be complaining about then? Playing revisionist history and acting like there was only one clear move this early on is premature. The coaches have seen these guys day in and day out since the fall and have a plan based on what they've seen. I'm not sold on this pitching staff yet, but it's been head and shoulders above what we saw from Borrell imo.
Sure, it's a bad loss, but it's no worse than the loss that was on the offense two days earlier. It's baseball. It's early. Slow your roll and let this team figure out what they are before you get your panties in a wad over 1 game and 1 coaching decision you didn't agree with.
Despite the negative takeaway from the weekend of a couple of yall, we had one bad pitching performace (and really only two guys got hit hard). The offense is on par with what we've seen the past few years and where we need it to be and will only get better as the weather warms up. The pitching is still a question mark - I've been preaching that over and over again. As much as you can't look at these games and good performances and take away that we're a stellar staff, you also can't look at one bad game and take away that the pitching sucks. It's undeniable that we're throwing more strikes and walking fewer batters so far. I'll take making guys put the ball in play to beat us over walking guys all day.
We have a lot of baseball to play over the next week. Let's see how this next group of games play out and reassess.