Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
USF Postgame #USFvsGT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takethepoints" data-source="post: 624116" data-attributes="member: 265"><p>Just like Chan!</p><p></p><p>Well, not really, but it's been a long time since I could say that the D pulled our chestnuts out of the fire. I liked that a lot and I expected it. On O we are doing what we should be, but we aren't doing it all that well. To see what I mean think of what Paul wanted his QB to be: the best runner on field who could throw. We have three QB candidates who can all really run, who can all throw, and are learning a new O. It isn't that the new O is more complex then the spread option; it's that it is complex <em>in a different way</em>. Also, since the D isn't looking run first and can blitz with more success, the WRs are having to get used to shorter routes and less single coverage. </p><p></p><p>This is a learning process. I don't know why so many here seem to think that we can just jump off the turnip truck and be dy-no-mite in a new O. The coaches are having to learn as well. I think Patenaude is being honest about the talent he sees on the field, but learning how to use them and settling, especially, on who's going to run the show will simply take awhile. I'm not sure who that will be, but at present it seems comes down to Tobias and James. We have to have a little patience while this works its way out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takethepoints, post: 624116, member: 265"] Just like Chan! Well, not really, but it's been a long time since I could say that the D pulled our chestnuts out of the fire. I liked that a lot and I expected it. On O we are doing what we should be, but we aren't doing it all that well. To see what I mean think of what Paul wanted his QB to be: the best runner on field who could throw. We have three QB candidates who can all really run, who can all throw, and are learning a new O. It isn't that the new O is more complex then the spread option; it's that it is complex [I]in a different way[/I]. Also, since the D isn't looking run first and can blitz with more success, the WRs are having to get used to shorter routes and less single coverage. This is a learning process. I don't know why so many here seem to think that we can just jump off the turnip truck and be dy-no-mite in a new O. The coaches are having to learn as well. I think Patenaude is being honest about the talent he sees on the field, but learning how to use them and settling, especially, on who's going to run the show will simply take awhile. I'm not sure who that will be, but at present it seems comes down to Tobias and James. We have to have a little patience while this works its way out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
USF Postgame #USFvsGT
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top