gville_jacket
Ramblin' Wreck
- Messages
- 777
Haha fair enough. Sometimes for CB’s no stats are the best stats.The fact you didn't hear about him was because for the most part he locked down greene.
Haha fair enough. Sometimes for CB’s no stats are the best stats.The fact you didn't hear about him was because for the most part he locked down greene.
I’m response to Yeti-the call when Dontae was going down kept him from getting drilled by a guy. The UNC player let up when he heard the whistle.
And “play calling was meh when Yates was in”-sometimes if you have a playmaker(Sims) in there to execute, it makes the playcalling look a lot better…
Just re-watched the condensed game (The replay is not showing up on espn for me to watch?). I totally forgot about a huge play.
4th quarter. 14:19 left to play. UNC had just scored, and was only down 27-13. GT ball, 4th down and 3. If we miss this, UNC gets the ball and momentum to cut it to one score. Sims hits a wide open McGowan for a quick out--first down. Next play--TD to Carter and we go up three scores.
HUGE PLAY. Nice throw by Sims and nice catch by #2. McGowen has been such a revelation at WR. He is so consistent and it seems like he is always open. He's a big part of this team.
Yeah, I’ve thought the same thing. It’s a very low percentage play. Usually run by teams who are controlling the game or a team who doesn’t trust their QB to make a decision because it’s either a TD or incompletion. With GT going with athletic QB types we need to allow them to scramble and make plays with legs or arms. I hope we don’t see the fade again.In the red zone I am puzzled about the multiple fad routes (when Yates is in last two games) to the corner of the end zone to a short receiver. None successful.
CDP in his presser this week said they intentionally held off on QB draw and run packages while Yates was in, to save them for Sims. I think that may have been partly what they were doing there. It was an example of CDP being a half measure too cute for my taste, but it is what it is and he gets paid to Coach, while I get.. well.. buzzed on bourbon and craft beer and Arm chair QB with the added benefit of hindsight and no one knowing what I would do till after it happens and I comment on it. I’ve got a good arrangement but the pay is ****e.
I heard others in chat suggesting it’s a higher percentage play when the coverage is tight and they’re bumping us off the snap to try to get a cheap PI flag - not sure if that was the thought process ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Literally everyone I’ve seen isn’t giving us credit. That’s why we need to handle business this SaturdayOf course, UNC is saying it's not that GT is good, we just played poorly: https://chapelboro.com/sports/defen...kes-blame-for-georgia-tech-loss-that-is-on-me
Agree. Which is why to me the Pitt game feels huge.We do the same thing. Most of us didn’t say NIU was good—just that we played poorly.
I don’t think NIU is a good team, but we weren’t a good team when we played them. The GT team that beat UNC could be a good team, and played a good game, but good teams string together multiple good games in a row (Clemson counts for something)
I don't disagree. It's why I said "of course" Everyone seems to do that...say "We are a really good team and just had a bad day. The others guys are good, but really if we played them again we'd beat them." I'm not so sure with UNC. I think they are horribly over-rated...as usual.We do the same thing. Most of us didn’t say NIU was good—just that we played poorly.
I don’t think NIU is a good team, but we weren’t a good team when we played them. The GT team that beat UNC could be a good team, and played a good game, but good teams string together multiple good games in a row (Clemson counts for something)
I heard others in chat suggesting it’s a higher percentage play when the coverage is tight and they’re bumping us off the snap to try to get a cheap PI flag - not sure if that was the thought process ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
We had 50% more yards than NIU and they had 7 non garbage 3 and outs. UNC can't make those statements.We do the same thing. Most of us didn’t say NIU was good—just that we played poorly.
I don’t think NIU is a good team, but we weren’t a good team when we played them. The GT team that beat UNC could be a good team, and played a good game, but good teams string together multiple good games in a row (Clemson counts for something)
It was on ACC Network at 3 o'clock this morning. I would check there before ESPN.Just re-watched the condensed game (The replay is not showing up on espn for me to watch?). I totally forgot about a huge play.
4th quarter. 14:19 left to play. UNC had just scored, and was only down 27-13. GT ball, 4th down and 3. If we miss this, UNC gets the ball and momentum to cut it to one score. Sims hits a wide open McGowan for a quick out--first down. Next play--TD to Carter and we go up three scores.
HUGE PLAY. Nice throw by Sims and nice catch by #2. McGowen has been such a revelation at WR. He is so consistent and it seems like he is always open. He's a big part of this team.
One thing that’s always bothered me is the use of rankings when talking about wins or losses especially since we all know preseason rankings are biased. For instance, I could say we lost a close game to a top 10 team and beat a ranked opponent, etc. Or I could say we haven’t beaten anyone worth anything and lost to a team ranked 25th. I tend to go with post season rankings because, as UNC has shown, preseason polls are just BS. UNC was ranked highly before playing a single game because Mack Brown is an insider and UNC is part of the club. The season will show they suck at football. UGA has been pounding their chest for a month since they beat a soon to be unranked Clemson team. It’s just funny to me. For GT, we gotta simply keep winning these games against mediocre teams to get any love. UNC will jump us in the polls the minute they win another game.
This is absolutely fantastic - great find and thanks for the share. I hadn't seen it before but am bookmarking it.