Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
UNCheat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 353166" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>Not really. I think having fraudulent classes from an entirely fraudulent department not publicly listed would indicate more a lack of control from the school administration. Class credit did show up on transcripts. They did get credit for the classes when they petitioned for a degree. I would think that a school would pay extra attention to any class that carries credit, but isn't publicly listed. To me, that would point more to the academic administration being complicit with fraud. As to athletic academic advisers sending athletes to the classes, I think it is probably very common for advisers to send players to classes that carry credit towards a degree and are historically easy. I think many non-athlete students would try to get into classes that are easy grades if they count toward their degree. The difference at UNC was that the classes themselves were shams. Just because athletic advisers suggested these classes doesn't mean that they knew they were fraudulent.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 353166, member: 2426"] Not really. I think having fraudulent classes from an entirely fraudulent department not publicly listed would indicate more a lack of control from the school administration. Class credit did show up on transcripts. They did get credit for the classes when they petitioned for a degree. I would think that a school would pay extra attention to any class that carries credit, but isn't publicly listed. To me, that would point more to the academic administration being complicit with fraud. As to athletic academic advisers sending athletes to the classes, I think it is probably very common for advisers to send players to classes that carry credit towards a degree and are historically easy. I think many non-athlete students would try to get into classes that are easy grades if they count toward their degree. The difference at UNC was that the classes themselves were shams. Just because athletic advisers suggested these classes doesn't mean that they knew they were fraudulent. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
UNCheat
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top