Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
UNCheat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 352735" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>I had said that it should go this way. I don't remember that I predicted one way or another. These offenses were squarely the responsibility of the University and the accreditation authority. The bigger problem in my opinion is that the SACS penalties have already taken place and in my opinion were very light. They were on accreditation probation for one year. I don't know much about accreditation. Some on this board do. It seems very odd to me that schools that: Have political people replace board members(Louisville), or have financial issues(Art Institute of Atlanta): receive the same or greater punishment than a school that has purely bogus classes that count for a degree. If a school can use many hours of no-show, no-work to count toward a degree and still be accredited, I don't understand what good accreditation does in the first place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 352735, member: 2426"] I had said that it should go this way. I don't remember that I predicted one way or another. These offenses were squarely the responsibility of the University and the accreditation authority. The bigger problem in my opinion is that the SACS penalties have already taken place and in my opinion were very light. They were on accreditation probation for one year. I don't know much about accreditation. Some on this board do. It seems very odd to me that schools that: Have political people replace board members(Louisville), or have financial issues(Art Institute of Atlanta): receive the same or greater punishment than a school that has purely bogus classes that count for a degree. If a school can use many hours of no-show, no-work to count toward a degree and still be accredited, I don't understand what good accreditation does in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
UNCheat
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top