Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
This is how our mpg look like at each position so far
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bcaff" data-source="post: 104441" data-attributes="member: 1079"><p>I took the total mpg for each player and extrapolated how many mpg each player is playing at each position. I had to make some assumptions that probably aren't 100% accurate, but I think still shows the basic idea. </p><p></p><p>I'm surprised so far that JH has played so much. I know TJ isn't 100%, but I would have expected CH to take more of the workload. I've been pleasantly surprised by JH's play. </p><p></p><p>I like MGH playing significant minutes at the 2. It allows us to play bigger and put our best 5 players on the court. SF is the more natural position for QS. It's not surprising that MGH is playing the most, but I wouldn't have expected before the season started that QS would be second on the team. This is probably a result of QS playing so well and only having two players who can really play at SF.</p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]589[/ATTACH] </p><p></p><p>Some assumptions:</p><p>SG needed 0.3 mpg from PG, so I assumed JH is probably the most likely out of TJ and CH to play some minutes at the 2</p><p>I have Charles Mitchell as the only PF to play at C. RS and AG could have some minutes there, but I'm not sure how it'd all add up</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bcaff, post: 104441, member: 1079"] I took the total mpg for each player and extrapolated how many mpg each player is playing at each position. I had to make some assumptions that probably aren't 100% accurate, but I think still shows the basic idea. I'm surprised so far that JH has played so much. I know TJ isn't 100%, but I would have expected CH to take more of the workload. I've been pleasantly surprised by JH's play. I like MGH playing significant minutes at the 2. It allows us to play bigger and put our best 5 players on the court. SF is the more natural position for QS. It's not surprising that MGH is playing the most, but I wouldn't have expected before the season started that QS would be second on the team. This is probably a result of QS playing so well and only having two players who can really play at SF. [ATTACH=full]589[/ATTACH] Some assumptions: SG needed 0.3 mpg from PG, so I assumed JH is probably the most likely out of TJ and CH to play some minutes at the 2 I have Charles Mitchell as the only PF to play at C. RS and AG could have some minutes there, but I'm not sure how it'd all add up [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
This is how our mpg look like at each position so far
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top