Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Temple Post Game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 638057" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>Right. This is what frustrates me so much about this forum sometimes. There seems to be this need to turn every single thread into an off vs on debate. When someone posts any frustration with poor performance then that seems to be justification to putting words in people's mouths.</p><p></p><p>According to the poll: <a href="https://gtswarm.com/threads/georgia-tech-vs-temple-predictions-gtvstem.19611/" target="_blank">https://gtswarm.com/threads/georgia-tech-vs-temple-predictions-gtvstem.19611/</a></p><p>45.7% believed we should beat Temple. Saying that we should beat Temple is not the same as saying it's an auto-win.</p><p></p><p>Saying that we should be able to beat Citadel and Temple is an expression of a defensible opinion. Saying that we were a hustle play against USF from being winless is simply a fact. Somebody being "positive we'd be 3-1 right now" with CPJ is also a defensible opinion.</p><p></p><p>If you disagree with the opinion, then bring up reasons why you disagree with the opinion that's stated. That's a healthy conversation. Don't create a straw-man that people are saying it's an auto-win and then attack that. Imo, that's like either like a personal attack or trolling.</p><p></p><p>Finally, we lost looking worse than everyone expected. Would people have reacted the same way if we lost by 7 after giving up two turnovers? Probably not, imo.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 638057, member: 195"] Right. This is what frustrates me so much about this forum sometimes. There seems to be this need to turn every single thread into an off vs on debate. When someone posts any frustration with poor performance then that seems to be justification to putting words in people's mouths. According to the poll: [URL]https://gtswarm.com/threads/georgia-tech-vs-temple-predictions-gtvstem.19611/[/URL] 45.7% believed we should beat Temple. Saying that we should beat Temple is not the same as saying it's an auto-win. Saying that we should be able to beat Citadel and Temple is an expression of a defensible opinion. Saying that we were a hustle play against USF from being winless is simply a fact. Somebody being "positive we'd be 3-1 right now" with CPJ is also a defensible opinion. If you disagree with the opinion, then bring up reasons why you disagree with the opinion that's stated. That's a healthy conversation. Don't create a straw-man that people are saying it's an auto-win and then attack that. Imo, that's like either like a personal attack or trolling. Finally, we lost looking worse than everyone expected. Would people have reacted the same way if we lost by 7 after giving up two turnovers? Probably not, imo. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Temple Post Game
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top