Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Temple Post Game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 637083" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>Regarding swapping to what we do best...</p><p>1. Duke has added a flexbone set, and they’ve tried it in every game. They haven’t, to my eyes, done a good job with it. Even with an offensive guru as their coach. If you go flexbone, you might have to go 100% flexbone. </p><p>2. Our old scheme wasn’t all cut blocking, and I don’t know to what percentage we did cut block, but our stance, our splits, our reads, who our blocks were, and our physical conditioning were all different. I have my doubts that we can adopt two different blocking philosophies at the same time, especially if we’re trying to build up for more of a traditional blocking scheme.</p><p>3. There are some option-heavy schemes out there that split the difference. They tend to use a more traditional blocking scheme. The traditional blocking scheme is part of what we’re having trouble with. </p><p>4. If we’re having trouble with an offense after an entire offseason preparing for it, how good are our chances to make huge scheme changes in mid-season?</p><p>5. If by “do something you do best” means more run option with the same kind of blocking, aren’t we already doing that?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 637083, member: 282"] Regarding swapping to what we do best... 1. Duke has added a flexbone set, and they’ve tried it in every game. They haven’t, to my eyes, done a good job with it. Even with an offensive guru as their coach. If you go flexbone, you might have to go 100% flexbone. 2. Our old scheme wasn’t all cut blocking, and I don’t know to what percentage we did cut block, but our stance, our splits, our reads, who our blocks were, and our physical conditioning were all different. I have my doubts that we can adopt two different blocking philosophies at the same time, especially if we’re trying to build up for more of a traditional blocking scheme. 3. There are some option-heavy schemes out there that split the difference. They tend to use a more traditional blocking scheme. The traditional blocking scheme is part of what we’re having trouble with. 4. If we’re having trouble with an offense after an entire offseason preparing for it, how good are our chances to make huge scheme changes in mid-season? 5. If by “do something you do best” means more run option with the same kind of blocking, aren’t we already doing that? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Temple Post Game
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top