Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Tech vs. Louisville
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="minorityoption" data-source="post: 954897" data-attributes="member: 2455"><p>I hear you. However, the WR room is better — no doubt. There is simply more speed and quickness depth which we have lacked (sans Nate). Although Jeff Sims is talented, a great guy, and apparently exciting Nebraskans, he simply wasn’t in a position to succeed in Atlanta. Our QB room is better simply due to depth, chemistry, and culture. </p><p></p><p>Buster and Weinke have bought in. Chip Long was filling a gap. I have zero doubt we make better use of the talent we have. Developing confidence and enforcing accountability is what we needed and I think we have it.</p><p></p><p>DL lost Keion, but I believe is overall better and deeper. The interior DL has the size to complement the ability that we are not used to. Biggers, Douse, Lockett, etc. — yes, please. </p><p></p><p>I cannot speak on the annual “OL is a question mark” discussion. The new leadership structure and more competitive off-season can only be a plus. Sounds like they are in positive physical shape. </p><p></p><p>LBs will be interesting to follow as they are unknowns while having a few talented guys to develop — could take some time.</p><p></p><p>Secondary has a lot of experience. One year older for a relatively large group should help naturally. The CP/Brooks combination is exciting. Was it Harvey that received some coach recognition for his play in camp thus far?</p><p></p><p>Special teams? #1 — Simply punt the ball and we have already improved. Who has been fielding kick returns? We have some speed to place there this year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="minorityoption, post: 954897, member: 2455"] I hear you. However, the WR room is better — no doubt. There is simply more speed and quickness depth which we have lacked (sans Nate). Although Jeff Sims is talented, a great guy, and apparently exciting Nebraskans, he simply wasn’t in a position to succeed in Atlanta. Our QB room is better simply due to depth, chemistry, and culture. Buster and Weinke have bought in. Chip Long was filling a gap. I have zero doubt we make better use of the talent we have. Developing confidence and enforcing accountability is what we needed and I think we have it. DL lost Keion, but I believe is overall better and deeper. The interior DL has the size to complement the ability that we are not used to. Biggers, Douse, Lockett, etc. — yes, please. I cannot speak on the annual “OL is a question mark” discussion. The new leadership structure and more competitive off-season can only be a plus. Sounds like they are in positive physical shape. LBs will be interesting to follow as they are unknowns while having a few talented guys to develop — could take some time. Secondary has a lot of experience. One year older for a relatively large group should help naturally. The CP/Brooks combination is exciting. Was it Harvey that received some coach recognition for his play in camp thus far? Special teams? #1 — Simply punt the ball and we have already improved. Who has been fielding kick returns? We have some speed to place there this year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Tech vs. Louisville
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top