Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stansbury added to Playoff Committee
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gtsucks" data-source="post: 393171" data-attributes="member: 3624"><p>They chose Stansbury because they needed a guy who would never need to recuse himself.</p><p></p><p>In other news, expanding to a 16 team playoff is way too many. 8 is arguable, but if you finished the regular season ranked outside the top ten then you have no business playing for a natty. I like it at 4 as that creates a little bit of drama as to what conference will get left out. People can b*tch about conference champs getting left out and non-conference champs getting in, but the committee never said that was a requirement. Only that it was on factor among many and the circumstances vary from year to year. A conference title might be the deciding factor one year (2014 Ohio State vs TCU/Baylor) and then another year it might come down to W-L and SOS (2015 Ohio State, 2017 Alabama). Imagine if conference champs got an automatic bid and a team like 2017 Stanford (9-3) won the PAC. Do they really deserve a spot at the table? They lost to San Diego State for crying out loud. Expansion only weakens the prestige if getting in and makes the regular season games less exciting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gtsucks, post: 393171, member: 3624"] They chose Stansbury because they needed a guy who would never need to recuse himself. In other news, expanding to a 16 team playoff is way too many. 8 is arguable, but if you finished the regular season ranked outside the top ten then you have no business playing for a natty. I like it at 4 as that creates a little bit of drama as to what conference will get left out. People can b*tch about conference champs getting left out and non-conference champs getting in, but the committee never said that was a requirement. Only that it was on factor among many and the circumstances vary from year to year. A conference title might be the deciding factor one year (2014 Ohio State vs TCU/Baylor) and then another year it might come down to W-L and SOS (2015 Ohio State, 2017 Alabama). Imagine if conference champs got an automatic bid and a team like 2017 Stanford (9-3) won the PAC. Do they really deserve a spot at the table? They lost to San Diego State for crying out loud. Expansion only weakens the prestige if getting in and makes the regular season games less exciting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stansbury added to Playoff Committee
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top