FredJacket
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 7,408
- Location
- Fredericksburg, Virginia
The proverbial foot is on their throat. Finish today.
Score early & give them no daylight.
Score early & give them no daylight.
I'm not sure how meaningful this is, but Stanford is throwing their normal "Friday guy" today. He was a projected 1st round pick entering the season, but he has struggled to this point.The proverbial foot is on their throat. Finish today.
Score early & give them no daylight.
I watched the Drew Burress post game interview on Twitter with Lacy and Burress stated we have a big time prospect on the mound tomorrow we just gotta hit to back him up. So we may be going with Chicoli to start today.
Second weekend in a row where we gave up more runs on Friday using our two best pitchers than we gave up in the last two games combined. And how about Spivey - 5 innings with only 1 run allowed.
Makes one question the definition of best?
I agree, but I'm also with what other people have said where if we don't need him on Friday or Saturday, then he starts on Sunday which is why we have gone TBA the last couple of weekends. I'm fine with that strategy because we have other guys that can fill the Sunday role.
I think this is correct. The TBD is listed as TBD because it truly is TBD. No gamesmanship...the Sunday starter depends on how Friday and Saturday play out. We've got a couple of pitchers (Patel clearly, but also Paden, IMO) who are OK with and arguably even thriving in the flexible role of "be ready when we call on you". Not all pitchers can do that, but when you find one who can it is gold.
I'll also note that very few teams in the entire country, like close to zero, have three pitchers who can be counted on to give you 5 solid innings even 3 out of every 4 weekends. I haven't studied every pitching staff, but of the ones I'm familiar with I don't think any of them do. It would be awesome, but extremely rare, to be able to have all 3 weekend spots locked down with anything close to reliable pitchers.
Regarding Giesler, I think CFDH and CJR are playing the long-game. The kid can hit, as the old saying goes, "the back of his baseball card" says so. But he is, #1, streaky, and #2, he appears to need game reps. Therefore, as long as he isn't hurting the team, you keep trotting him out there, knowing (hoping) that it pays off in May and June. Sit him now cause we're only winning by an average of 8 runs instead of 10 runs would almost guarantee that you don't have him sharp in May and June. It also helps that he seems to be giving the best 1B defense of anyone not named Kyle Schmidt.
I understand as I was at the game, but my point remains that Paden is needed more on Sundays vs Saturdays imo as Brady averages more innings than Riley.
No matter if it is long relief or as a starter.
I would think about starting Ballard tomorrow. He throws strikes and doesn't give up free passes.
I could care less about who pitches anymore.
The team era is 4.00. That hasn't happened in a VERY long time this deep into the season. At this point, I could care less if Santa Claus pitches on Sundays.
Taylor and Hall have a plan and it's working.
I'll eat the crow and completely leave it alone.
We have 13-14 trustworthy arms, and this may very well be the deepest pitching staff we've had in over a decade.
As for the offense, there are absolutely no more words.
10 or more runs for 18 of 32 games.
6 more doubles
4 more hr's
2 grand slams
Lead the nation in a lot of offensive categories.
All while Kent Schmidt has been out for three weeks.
We should skyrocket up the polls as Tuesday night should be a matchup of top 15 teams. I'm stoked about being there on Tuesday. Only reason we are ranked so low currently is preseason perceived bias.
Most of us have always said if the pitching begins to match the hitting.....look out!
And whether you like Rpi or not, we are now up to 11. Btw- Marshall just took the series from #16 southern miss.
We only trail Clemson in the Acc now and had we closed out game 3 against the tigers in the 9th, this team would hold 1st place alone.
I'm beyond impressed with this team!
Go crush the tigers on Tuesday night!
I think Riley getting the hook was the right call. But I also think he has some serious stuff, and has a lot of value as an inning or two of heat out of the bullpen. He's been good when he doesn't have to make it to 5.Interested in seeing who gets the start on Tuesday. Would think it'd be Swygert or Chicoli. I guess there's always a chance they let Riley get a shot too, but I'd rather see one of the other two.
Regarding the 1st line, I also expect that Spivey will be the starter this coming Sunday. He certainly earned it. But that isn't evidence that this was also true this past weekend. As Nuke says, when the facts change your actions should change. Regarding the 2nd line, I think most everyone is saying that when Patel and Paden will be used is situational. That has been the stated understanding all season.Again, you very well could be right, but I doubt it. I don't think we see TBD on there this weekend. I think Spivey earned his name there.
I think it's obvious now, but Riley on Sundays isn't going to be a thing anymore. Even so, (not speaking to you only, but) I don't think there's going to be a set Patel on Fridays with Tate, Paden on Saturdays with Brady, etc like some of you keep inferring. Taylor could decide to play it that way, but I think it'll be more situational than that.
Regarding the 1st line, I also expect that Spivey will be the starter this coming Sunday. He certainly earned it. But that isn't evidence that this was also true this past weekend. As Nuke says, when the facts change your actions should change.
Regarding the 2nd line, I think most everyone is saying that when Patel and Paden will be used is situational. That has been the stated understanding all season.
Regarding line 3, no, one should very rarely play the "I told y'all card". When one is wrong they should stand up and admit that, but when right one should endeavor to remain as silent as possible (IMO).