- Messages
- 2,856
After reviewing scrimmage videos, spring game video, and 2013 season I think this is reasonable to say:
JT showed his speed, agility, and willingness to pitch. He also showed an eye for reading the 3TO and cross charges. He was not perfect but better than Vad in reading the 3TO.
Byerly had very good footwork, great mesh reads/timing in the diamond, and showed powerful running. He also showed the most touch on passing.
Vad had more experienced/stable smoother look. I think Vad was the better pick for winning the game at the time, but not a good investment for the future (easier said on this side of things). Vad was not bad and given a better/healthier OL things might have been different.
JT or Byerly are not game changers at this point, but I am excited to see what they can become. I do think they both will surpass Vad in effectiveness, but the OL will determine our offensive success.
JT showed his speed, agility, and willingness to pitch. He also showed an eye for reading the 3TO and cross charges. He was not perfect but better than Vad in reading the 3TO.
Byerly had very good footwork, great mesh reads/timing in the diamond, and showed powerful running. He also showed the most touch on passing.
Vad had more experienced/stable smoother look. I think Vad was the better pick for winning the game at the time, but not a good investment for the future (easier said on this side of things). Vad was not bad and given a better/healthier OL things might have been different.
JT or Byerly are not game changers at this point, but I am excited to see what they can become. I do think they both will surpass Vad in effectiveness, but the OL will determine our offensive success.