Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Specific questions about CPJ backing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 463687" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>Right now, I'd be happy with top 25 territory. I think this is a great post. Other schools like Duke have picked up on their staffing and support more than we have, and that hurt us a few years ago. Some smart people think that CNW just needs a little time to build something great on defense, but CPJ might not have enough time. </p><p></p><p>I will say that we've had some problems in support in the athletic department, but some of it seems self-inflicted. Negative recruiting, special teams, and defense have been problems for about 9 out of 10 years. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I went out to look for the spending numbers. The Knight Foundation had some numbers through 2015, and we seemed to have a decent budget through then: <a href="http://spendingdatabase.knightcommission.org/fbs/acc" target="_blank">http://spendingdatabase.knightcommission.org/fbs/acc</a> . We spent a lot per athlete. </p><p></p><p>There were some other numbers through USA Today that got posted to a UT blog, but just the public numbers: <a href="https://247sports.com/college/virginia-tech/ContentGallery/Virginia-Tech-Hokies-Football-Recruiting-Revenue-Spending-Gaps-Continue-to-Widen-Across-the-ACC-119587438/#119587438_3" target="_blank">https://247sports.com/college/virginia-tech/ContentGallery/Virginia-Tech-Hokies-Football-Recruiting-Revenue-Spending-Gaps-Continue-to-Widen-Across-the-ACC-119587438/#119587438_3</a>. These show us behind the other reported schools. </p><p></p><p>Duke, Syracuse, Pitt, and others don't show up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 463687, member: 282"] Right now, I'd be happy with top 25 territory. I think this is a great post. Other schools like Duke have picked up on their staffing and support more than we have, and that hurt us a few years ago. Some smart people think that CNW just needs a little time to build something great on defense, but CPJ might not have enough time. I will say that we've had some problems in support in the athletic department, but some of it seems self-inflicted. Negative recruiting, special teams, and defense have been problems for about 9 out of 10 years. I went out to look for the spending numbers. The Knight Foundation had some numbers through 2015, and we seemed to have a decent budget through then: [URL]http://spendingdatabase.knightcommission.org/fbs/acc[/URL] . We spent a lot per athlete. There were some other numbers through USA Today that got posted to a UT blog, but just the public numbers: [URL]https://247sports.com/college/virginia-tech/ContentGallery/Virginia-Tech-Hokies-Football-Recruiting-Revenue-Spending-Gaps-Continue-to-Widen-Across-the-ACC-119587438/#119587438_3[/URL]. These show us behind the other reported schools. Duke, Syracuse, Pitt, and others don't show up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Specific questions about CPJ backing
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top