Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Reservations for this season
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="YJMD" data-source="post: 545070" data-attributes="member: 1929"><p>I share some distaste for gimmicks, but I can say unequivocally so far that CGC has backed up his gimmicks with substance. He has absolutely been heavily involved in instituting a clear image of Tech football and a structure that supports that, and he has backed up these things with communication and connection to staff. The staff we've assembled have nearly all highlighted their prior working relationship with CGC and his reputation over years in the biz. People came here not simply because it was an opportunity for career advancement.</p><p></p><p>The on-field product? Who knows. We have a serious talent gap with 2 established national powers on our schedule. I seriously doubt we close that and compete with Clemson and the Dwags in the near future. Miami has the next most talent, but they haven't been able to leverage it well, and they're going through regime change as well. Duke and UVA are perhaps the more realistic litmus tests as stable programs, although UVA under Bronco has been underwhelming but had a generally good product last year. Cutcliffe is always gonna have a well-coached team and has had athletes on par with CPJ's.</p><p></p><p>My expectation? Bowl eligibility. But I'm not going to make much meaning out of the results even if it's another 3-9 season unless we fail to be cohesive as a team.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="YJMD, post: 545070, member: 1929"] I share some distaste for gimmicks, but I can say unequivocally so far that CGC has backed up his gimmicks with substance. He has absolutely been heavily involved in instituting a clear image of Tech football and a structure that supports that, and he has backed up these things with communication and connection to staff. The staff we've assembled have nearly all highlighted their prior working relationship with CGC and his reputation over years in the biz. People came here not simply because it was an opportunity for career advancement. The on-field product? Who knows. We have a serious talent gap with 2 established national powers on our schedule. I seriously doubt we close that and compete with Clemson and the Dwags in the near future. Miami has the next most talent, but they haven't been able to leverage it well, and they're going through regime change as well. Duke and UVA are perhaps the more realistic litmus tests as stable programs, although UVA under Bronco has been underwhelming but had a generally good product last year. Cutcliffe is always gonna have a well-coached team and has had athletes on par with CPJ's. My expectation? Bowl eligibility. But I'm not going to make much meaning out of the results even if it's another 3-9 season unless we fail to be cohesive as a team. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Reservations for this season
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top