Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Ranking the ACC for Prospective Coaches
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RamblinRed" data-source="post: 214069" data-attributes="member: 1776"><p>To me Clemson and VT are so easy to see as the bottom 2 - there is little argument to put them higher, and frankly Wake may not be much above them. BC is down here because their school doesn't value basketball or put money into it. It is probably the #3 sport at BC behind Hockey and Football. </p><p>if you remove current coaching from it and look at it just from a resources, recruiting, history standpoint GT should be in the 6-7 area that you mention Cuse. </p><p></p><p>The top 3 imo are so easy and so separated there really isn't any debate there. </p><p>Cuse has pretty strong history incl a NC, but i wonder how it's placement in upstate NY and the general reduction in talent in the NY area will affect it long term. Pitt suffers from some of the same potential demographic issues. </p><p></p><p>UVA was a consistent underachiever imo until Bennett was hired. With Gard getting the job at WI, UVA may be set up to be the most consistent winner over the next 2 decades. </p><p>NCST is probably the hardest to peg. You can put some huge positives on them, but they also tend to suffer from little brother syndrome with UNC and Duke. Some coaches won't like that, others will see pass it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RamblinRed, post: 214069, member: 1776"] To me Clemson and VT are so easy to see as the bottom 2 - there is little argument to put them higher, and frankly Wake may not be much above them. BC is down here because their school doesn't value basketball or put money into it. It is probably the #3 sport at BC behind Hockey and Football. if you remove current coaching from it and look at it just from a resources, recruiting, history standpoint GT should be in the 6-7 area that you mention Cuse. The top 3 imo are so easy and so separated there really isn't any debate there. Cuse has pretty strong history incl a NC, but i wonder how it's placement in upstate NY and the general reduction in talent in the NY area will affect it long term. Pitt suffers from some of the same potential demographic issues. UVA was a consistent underachiever imo until Bennett was hired. With Gard getting the job at WI, UVA may be set up to be the most consistent winner over the next 2 decades. NCST is probably the hardest to peg. You can put some huge positives on them, but they also tend to suffer from little brother syndrome with UNC and Duke. Some coaches won't like that, others will see pass it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Ranking the ACC for Prospective Coaches
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top