Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
QB Situation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alentrekin" data-source="post: 626662" data-attributes="member: 2909"><p>That's a little too narrow bc sacks, and it really just shows what eyeballs saw. This isn't that much better, but their ypp are Oliver 4.39, Johnson 3.72, Graham 6.05. Obviously not enough plate appearances yet.</p><p></p><p>On a rant, they talk a lot about "analytics", but basing everything on catapult numbers doesn't do as much for the offense as it does the D. Like ATL, I have a lingering concern that we are seeing CPJ in reverse in some ways. Player load metrics are great for figuring out when to sit a defensive lineman, and probably an OL/RB too, but it has very little to do with QB or WR...unless we keep running the option. </p><p></p><p>I actually think that they have thought of all this, but focusing on effort or even execution (if it's not ultimately linked directly to production) for a quarterback is a bad idea. Just like one wants an effort based pitching staff, no one wants an effort based spread passing game. The "4 inches" that CDP is talking about on the Camp seam route is not just the difference between good numbers and bad, it's actually very measurable if you have thousands of practice reps. MLB started tracking this stuff for a reason, but their experience shows that it takes a really long time to get useful information. But when you have it, you'll know the probability of him making a catch at deeper ranges -- basically a spray chart --which then you can layer that with fatigue, opponents, coverages, situations, etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alentrekin, post: 626662, member: 2909"] That's a little too narrow bc sacks, and it really just shows what eyeballs saw. This isn't that much better, but their ypp are Oliver 4.39, Johnson 3.72, Graham 6.05. Obviously not enough plate appearances yet. On a rant, they talk a lot about "analytics", but basing everything on catapult numbers doesn't do as much for the offense as it does the D. Like ATL, I have a lingering concern that we are seeing CPJ in reverse in some ways. Player load metrics are great for figuring out when to sit a defensive lineman, and probably an OL/RB too, but it has very little to do with QB or WR...unless we keep running the option. I actually think that they have thought of all this, but focusing on effort or even execution (if it's not ultimately linked directly to production) for a quarterback is a bad idea. Just like one wants an effort based pitching staff, no one wants an effort based spread passing game. The "4 inches" that CDP is talking about on the Camp seam route is not just the difference between good numbers and bad, it's actually very measurable if you have thousands of practice reps. MLB started tracking this stuff for a reason, but their experience shows that it takes a really long time to get useful information. But when you have it, you'll know the probability of him making a catch at deeper ranges -- basically a spray chart --which then you can layer that with fatigue, opponents, coverages, situations, etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
QB Situation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top