Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
QB battle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Boomergump" data-source="post: 328206" data-attributes="member: 639"><p>I don't know about the rest of you guys, but I am finding the drama surrounding our QB position this year to be the most compelling story yet in the CPJ era. For me, it is truly exciting, perhaps partly because I have been a little more removed lately, combined with the knowledge that we have four guys (perhaps a fifth) who all appear to be making a strong case. Based on my limited observation, each of these four, should they win the position, would change the overall flavor of the offense and the types of games that will be called. There is something (or somebody) for every fan, depending on what style you like. Eventually, we will need to pick before the fine tuning of our offensive game plan and team chemistry can take shape. Can you imagine what it would be like to be coach right now? Holy cow. It's a nice problem to have, but a huge decision at the same time.</p><p></p><p>If you want us to raise the pass/run ratio some, spreading the field through the air, while losing a little wiggle at the QB position, then LJ is probably your horse.</p><p></p><p>If you covet the power run game between the tackles with a higher percentage of follows and midline (probably fewer counter options than with JT) while smashing mouth, then MJ is probably your guy.</p><p></p><p>If you liked the look of the offense in the JT era and would like the fewest stylistic changes (not to be confused with actual results), then that probably means TM.</p><p></p><p>If you want the ball in the hands of a wildly athletic player every snap who can improvise (whether running or scrambling) when needed and turn nothing into a huge play, while learning to capitalize on the talent around him and work within the scheme, then JJ is your guy.</p><p></p><p>CPJ is no dummy. He is going to call the games towards the strengths of the guy he picks. This will, in turn, modify slightly the roles of the supporting cast. Considering this, it makes sense that the decision is made around the time that preparation for UT begins so that game plans can be fully implemented and repped out. Hang on tight.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Boomergump, post: 328206, member: 639"] I don't know about the rest of you guys, but I am finding the drama surrounding our QB position this year to be the most compelling story yet in the CPJ era. For me, it is truly exciting, perhaps partly because I have been a little more removed lately, combined with the knowledge that we have four guys (perhaps a fifth) who all appear to be making a strong case. Based on my limited observation, each of these four, should they win the position, would change the overall flavor of the offense and the types of games that will be called. There is something (or somebody) for every fan, depending on what style you like. Eventually, we will need to pick before the fine tuning of our offensive game plan and team chemistry can take shape. Can you imagine what it would be like to be coach right now? Holy cow. It's a nice problem to have, but a huge decision at the same time. If you want us to raise the pass/run ratio some, spreading the field through the air, while losing a little wiggle at the QB position, then LJ is probably your horse. If you covet the power run game between the tackles with a higher percentage of follows and midline (probably fewer counter options than with JT) while smashing mouth, then MJ is probably your guy. If you liked the look of the offense in the JT era and would like the fewest stylistic changes (not to be confused with actual results), then that probably means TM. If you want the ball in the hands of a wildly athletic player every snap who can improvise (whether running or scrambling) when needed and turn nothing into a huge play, while learning to capitalize on the talent around him and work within the scheme, then JJ is your guy. CPJ is no dummy. He is going to call the games towards the strengths of the guy he picks. This will, in turn, modify slightly the roles of the supporting cast. Considering this, it makes sense that the decision is made around the time that preparation for UT begins so that game plans can be fully implemented and repped out. Hang on tight. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
QB battle
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top