Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Postgame BC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BCJacket" data-source="post: 243222" data-attributes="member: 2332"><p>It really irks me that CTR makes this argument. Are we really expected to believe that BC, for example, recruits at that much higher of a level? I put very little stock in recruiting rankings. But for what it's worth, rankings indicate BC recruits slightly worse than GT. Example:<a href="http://athlonsports.com/college-football/ranking-college-footballs-rosters-2016?ModPagespeed=noscript" target="_blank"> GT #55 - BC #66 </a>. Others have made this point as well. Maybe BC really does recruit Saban level talent only on D, but I doubt it. Are we really saying GT has less talent on D than every FCS team that runs bilitzes? </p><p></p><p>App State was getting after Dobbs and nearly upset Tennessee (<a href="http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=17444335" target="_blank">E.g.</a>) . If Roof thinks GT's talent level is that far behind the Sun Belt... maybe we should just de-emphasize athletics and be done with it. </p><p></p><p>If I see Mercer send five next week I'm gonna lose it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BCJacket, post: 243222, member: 2332"] It really irks me that CTR makes this argument. Are we really expected to believe that BC, for example, recruits at that much higher of a level? I put very little stock in recruiting rankings. But for what it's worth, rankings indicate BC recruits slightly worse than GT. Example:[URL='http://athlonsports.com/college-football/ranking-college-footballs-rosters-2016?ModPagespeed=noscript'] GT #55 - BC #66 [/URL]. Others have made this point as well. Maybe BC really does recruit Saban level talent only on D, but I doubt it. Are we really saying GT has less talent on D than every FCS team that runs bilitzes? App State was getting after Dobbs and nearly upset Tennessee ([URL='http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=17444335']E.g.[/URL]) . If Roof thinks GT's talent level is that far behind the Sun Belt... maybe we should just de-emphasize athletics and be done with it. If I see Mercer send five next week I'm gonna lose it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Postgame BC
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top