Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Postgame BC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="4shotB" data-source="post: 243078" data-attributes="member: 844"><p>Maybe the subject of a different post, but why doesn't Paul have a D like that? He and Roof have been here awhile. Conversely, why doesn't Addazio have any O to speak of? Your post made me look up some data (which I am too lazy to do in most cases). I don't know (nor care) which recruiting service is "better" but I pulled this info from rivals. Here is the recruiting rankings (FWIW) for the years 2012 - 2015...i.e. the kids who were on the field for the most part Saturday....</p><p></p><p> <u> Year GT BC</u></p><p><u> </u> 2012 60 68 </p><p> 2013 84 89</p><p> 2014 49 43</p><p> 2015 38 49</p><p></p><p>So, it looks like GT and BC are about the same in terms of talent (if you believe the recruiting service, which is another topic altogether), what separates them in terms of their identities (GT known for its O and BC for its D)? Does their identities allow (or cause) the best recruits to fit more on one side of the ball? Eg, we have put several WR's in the pros, so we are more likely to attract WR's with high ceilings than BC?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="4shotB, post: 243078, member: 844"] Maybe the subject of a different post, but why doesn't Paul have a D like that? He and Roof have been here awhile. Conversely, why doesn't Addazio have any O to speak of? Your post made me look up some data (which I am too lazy to do in most cases). I don't know (nor care) which recruiting service is "better" but I pulled this info from rivals. Here is the recruiting rankings (FWIW) for the years 2012 - 2015...i.e. the kids who were on the field for the most part Saturday.... [U] Year GT BC [/U] 2012 60 68 2013 84 89 2014 49 43 2015 38 49 So, it looks like GT and BC are about the same in terms of talent (if you believe the recruiting service, which is another topic altogether), what separates them in terms of their identities (GT known for its O and BC for its D)? Does their identities allow (or cause) the best recruits to fit more on one side of the ball? Eg, we have put several WR's in the pros, so we are more likely to attract WR's with high ceilings than BC? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Postgame BC
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top