Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Post-Spring game season win total poll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vamosjackets" data-source="post: 574015" data-attributes="member: 216"><p>I've been told by a few on this board that not all 3-stars are equal, there are high 3-stars and low 3-stars. I don't have a problem with that argument, and can probably even buy into it. Also, the 4-star tag has not been very good to us lately for some reason. Most of our 4* recruits have not ended up being our best players. Bad luck? Maybe it's selective memory on my part and not thorough analysis. </p><p></p><p>Several counter-examples of teams in the top 20 in recruiting who are pretty darn bad on the field (FSU, Tenn for two, Miami hasn't been very good). I would like a more certain barometer for expectations for our recruiting and then expectations for performance based on that expectation for recruiting. Should top 30 make us think - no discernable difference? Should top 20 get us slightly excited, but we really should only get truly excited if we get in the top 10? top 5? What actually counts here? I think looking at our expectations for our team versus other teams when considering recruiting rankings helps point out flaws and inconsistencies in the typical way of thinking on this board. Many (most?) are saying that we should still expect to beat a team who is in the 20's when we're in the 50's, but that if and when we get in the 20's we should expect the opposite.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vamosjackets, post: 574015, member: 216"] I've been told by a few on this board that not all 3-stars are equal, there are high 3-stars and low 3-stars. I don't have a problem with that argument, and can probably even buy into it. Also, the 4-star tag has not been very good to us lately for some reason. Most of our 4* recruits have not ended up being our best players. Bad luck? Maybe it's selective memory on my part and not thorough analysis. Several counter-examples of teams in the top 20 in recruiting who are pretty darn bad on the field (FSU, Tenn for two, Miami hasn't been very good). I would like a more certain barometer for expectations for our recruiting and then expectations for performance based on that expectation for recruiting. Should top 30 make us think - no discernable difference? Should top 20 get us slightly excited, but we really should only get truly excited if we get in the top 10? top 5? What actually counts here? I think looking at our expectations for our team versus other teams when considering recruiting rankings helps point out flaws and inconsistencies in the typical way of thinking on this board. Many (most?) are saying that we should still expect to beat a team who is in the 20's when we're in the 50's, but that if and when we get in the 20's we should expect the opposite. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Post-Spring game season win total poll
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top