Not good for our chances. I would rather face a good d and bad o than other. I like our o's chances against anyone.Raw stats like Pitt's D, but footballoutsiders ranks their D at #64. It ranks their O at #15.
Raw stats like Pitt's D, but footballoutsiders ranks their D at #64. It ranks their O at #15.
Can we play a game like the Miami game without Laskey? That will be the biggest question to me going into the game.I think we match up well with Pitt. I think you will see a similar game as the Miami game. I Have watched several of there games and as long as we don't turn the ball over its a game we should control.
Where are all the dudes who've been calling all season for Synjyn to play more? Well now's his chance and now's your chance to see if your support is well placed.Can we play a game like the Miami game without Laskey? That will be the biggest question to me going into the game.
The 2nd biggest question will be, "Can our defense improve"? I think our defense matches up better with Pitt than Duke/UNC. I actually think we can stop the run better than the pass when a team is more traditional run than pass. But, I've been wrong a few times before.
That will change will GT rolls in. I say we need 4 stops from our D to win the game.
Can you post a link? I must be looking at the wrong one because I see it at 71.
I'm wondering if Pitt's good defensive rankings/numbers, is due in part to who they've played so far.
Like DCS gets at: can Days handle the rock 20+ times a game?
I don't know what Pitt runs, but it would be great if we could focus on JT keeping the ball: double options to the outside, QB Follows, QB Counters, Sprint passes with a QB run option, and so on.
I think we match up well with Pitt. I think you will see a similar game as the Miami game. I Have watched several of there games and as long as we don't turn the ball over its a game we should control.