- Messages
- 19,625
There is no question in anyone's mind, including Head Coach Geoff Collins', that penalties need to be addressed and cleaned up asap.
Last year, any number of things within GT's control would have won the FCS game. I've alleged better time management would have helped. But probably most concretely, dead ball penalties were ridiculous. Lot of 15-yard after-the-play variety as well as others where we extended The Citadel drives before the snap or after the play was over. It directly enabled scoring drives that otherwise would have been stopped.
Saturday @ Syracuse was more of the same where we needed to control the controllables and failed. Per the GT SID, Saturday's 15 penalties were the second-most that Tech has committed in a game in program history (record: 19 vs. Florida State, Sept. 9, 2000). Who was the coach in 2000? Was he nasty enough?
2020: Per Team Rankings.com (https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/penalties-per-game), of the 72 teams who have played a game, GT ranks #62 in penalties per game at 10.7/game. Not good. (the team 70 miles east of Atlanta is #68 after their first game).
2019: How does that compare to 2019? Using the same exact table, GT ranked #9 overall in the country in fewest penalties per game at 4.5/game. That is outstanding.
So what's the difference? What's the takeaway? For me:
Did the offseason also affect others? Based on my quick and dirty Excel spreadsheet math with the teamrankings data, penalties are up across the board by .6 penalties/game/team. UCF, our week two opponent who is now two games into their season, averages 13.5 penalties/game so far (vs. 8.7/game in 2019). Oklahoma is at 10/game (vs 6.8/game in 2019). I don't think those highly respected HC's became incapable.
Long story short, I think it's too soon to draw conclusions on penalty performance 3 games into the year. It obviously needs to improve for us to have success, given our low margin for error. But I'm not taking 2020 in a vacuum, given a full year of precedent in year 1 where we were outstanding.
What do you think?
Last year, any number of things within GT's control would have won the FCS game. I've alleged better time management would have helped. But probably most concretely, dead ball penalties were ridiculous. Lot of 15-yard after-the-play variety as well as others where we extended The Citadel drives before the snap or after the play was over. It directly enabled scoring drives that otherwise would have been stopped.
Saturday @ Syracuse was more of the same where we needed to control the controllables and failed. Per the GT SID, Saturday's 15 penalties were the second-most that Tech has committed in a game in program history (record: 19 vs. Florida State, Sept. 9, 2000). Who was the coach in 2000? Was he nasty enough?
2020: Per Team Rankings.com (https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/penalties-per-game), of the 72 teams who have played a game, GT ranks #62 in penalties per game at 10.7/game. Not good. (the team 70 miles east of Atlanta is #68 after their first game).
2019: How does that compare to 2019? Using the same exact table, GT ranked #9 overall in the country in fewest penalties per game at 4.5/game. That is outstanding.
So what's the difference? What's the takeaway? For me:
- The outlier games tend to stick in heads. I am guilty of this.
- Sometimes those outlier games actually affect a W vs. L. That is a real issue.
- Overall we were remarkably good at minimizing penalties in 2019
- Something that I am choosing to characterize as uncharacteristic (so far) has happened early in the 2020 season. This is the real question. What has changed?
Did the offseason also affect others? Based on my quick and dirty Excel spreadsheet math with the teamrankings data, penalties are up across the board by .6 penalties/game/team. UCF, our week two opponent who is now two games into their season, averages 13.5 penalties/game so far (vs. 8.7/game in 2019). Oklahoma is at 10/game (vs 6.8/game in 2019). I don't think those highly respected HC's became incapable.
Long story short, I think it's too soon to draw conclusions on penalty performance 3 games into the year. It obviously needs to improve for us to have success, given our low margin for error. But I'm not taking 2020 in a vacuum, given a full year of precedent in year 1 where we were outstanding.
What do you think?