Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Payroll Comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 1001346" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>I understand that. It is apparent from the replies to his twitter post that there are many people who do not. </p><p></p><p>If he isn't trying to insinuate that revenue is the same as profit, then what is he trying to say? His statement is basically that even after "all their player costs" the owners still have $150 million just from NFL distributions. The salary cap doesn't include "all their player costs" only salary. The NFL website announcement about the salary cap says "Total 2024 player costs will be $329.4 million per club" because it includes an additional $74 million per team for performance based pay and retired player benefits. When someone replies that it is a percentage and the salary cap goes up when overall revenue goes up, his response is "There is a lot of league revenue that is not shared with players.."</p><p></p><p>It seems apparent to me that he is trying to make the numbers look like something they are not. Even if you and I understand what the words he is using actually mean, he is still trying to use them to make people believe something that the words to not actually mean.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 1001346, member: 2426"] I understand that. It is apparent from the replies to his twitter post that there are many people who do not. If he isn't trying to insinuate that revenue is the same as profit, then what is he trying to say? His statement is basically that even after "all their player costs" the owners still have $150 million just from NFL distributions. The salary cap doesn't include "all their player costs" only salary. The NFL website announcement about the salary cap says "Total 2024 player costs will be $329.4 million per club" because it includes an additional $74 million per team for performance based pay and retired player benefits. When someone replies that it is a percentage and the salary cap goes up when overall revenue goes up, his response is "There is a lot of league revenue that is not shared with players.." It seems apparent to me that he is trying to make the numbers look like something they are not. Even if you and I understand what the words he is using actually mean, he is still trying to use them to make people believe something that the words to not actually mean. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Payroll Comparison
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top