Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Paul Johnson's job
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vespidae" data-source="post: 255469" data-attributes="member: 2957"><p>I don't think this piece is worth very much. </p><p></p><p>First, Tech and Georgia are at opposite ends of the expectations spectrum. UGA wants to be the next Alabama and a perennial Top 5 team. Tech wants to be a Top 5 STEM school and support it with a competitive football program. </p><p></p><p>Second, he could have made the exact same argument about Mark Richt. Why change from a guy who won consistently and the winningest coach since Dooley?</p><p></p><p>Third, UGA isn't crushing it out of the park. If you look at the ESPN team efficiency ratings, UGA is at 52.7 O, 74.8 D, 21.5 ST and 60.3 Overall. Tech, in comparison, is 58.9 O, 36.8 D, 72.1 ST, and 51.9 Overall. Alabama is 93.5 Overall. </p><p></p><p>So, Tech has some work to do to field an ACC competitive team. UGA has some work, in fact a lot of work, to field a competitive SEC team. </p><p></p><p>Personally, I like Tech's chances to win a future ACC title over UGA's chances to win an SEC. Tech needs to improve fund-raising and get some dough to spend. UGA already has that. Who's the bigger failure? UGA. </p><p></p><p>This is just red meat to a UGA hungry crowd.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vespidae, post: 255469, member: 2957"] I don't think this piece is worth very much. First, Tech and Georgia are at opposite ends of the expectations spectrum. UGA wants to be the next Alabama and a perennial Top 5 team. Tech wants to be a Top 5 STEM school and support it with a competitive football program. Second, he could have made the exact same argument about Mark Richt. Why change from a guy who won consistently and the winningest coach since Dooley? Third, UGA isn't crushing it out of the park. If you look at the ESPN team efficiency ratings, UGA is at 52.7 O, 74.8 D, 21.5 ST and 60.3 Overall. Tech, in comparison, is 58.9 O, 36.8 D, 72.1 ST, and 51.9 Overall. Alabama is 93.5 Overall. So, Tech has some work to do to field an ACC competitive team. UGA has some work, in fact a lot of work, to field a competitive SEC team. Personally, I like Tech's chances to win a future ACC title over UGA's chances to win an SEC. Tech needs to improve fund-raising and get some dough to spend. UGA already has that. Who's the bigger failure? UGA. This is just red meat to a UGA hungry crowd. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Paul Johnson's job
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top