Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Pastner cleared of Ron Bell lies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 601176" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>I just posted the WSB article because it is slightly less of a hit piece article. It contains additional information(as compared to the AJC article) about Bell and Pendley. They are under indictment for criminally intimidating a witness.(In the Pastner case) Pendley's lawyer has dropped her. I don't know if that is referring to the first lawyer that dropped them or if Pendley's second lawyer has dropped her too.</p><p></p><p>So this article has vague insinuations about Pastner also. However, it also contains information that makes Bell and Pendley look like nutjobs. It is slightly more balanced, although it still contains very strong insinuations about very vague information. If the first reporter actually thinks that he has new information, he should ask the NCAA investigators about it. If they agree that it is new information and are going to look into it, then publish the story with the information that the NCAA is investigating. If they don't agree, there is absolutely no story here. What happened it appears is that the reporter got some vague, maybe important/maybe insignificant, information and published insinuations with input from the opposing counsel involved in Pastner's lawsuit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 601176, member: 2426"] I just posted the WSB article because it is slightly less of a hit piece article. It contains additional information(as compared to the AJC article) about Bell and Pendley. They are under indictment for criminally intimidating a witness.(In the Pastner case) Pendley's lawyer has dropped her. I don't know if that is referring to the first lawyer that dropped them or if Pendley's second lawyer has dropped her too. So this article has vague insinuations about Pastner also. However, it also contains information that makes Bell and Pendley look like nutjobs. It is slightly more balanced, although it still contains very strong insinuations about very vague information. If the first reporter actually thinks that he has new information, he should ask the NCAA investigators about it. If they agree that it is new information and are going to look into it, then publish the story with the information that the NCAA is investigating. If they don't agree, there is absolutely no story here. What happened it appears is that the reporter got some vague, maybe important/maybe insignificant, information and published insinuations with input from the opposing counsel involved in Pastner's lawsuit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Pastner cleared of Ron Bell lies
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top