Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Pastner cleared of Ron Bell lies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brandon_cox" data-source="post: 430591" data-attributes="member: 3408"><p>So, I'm trying to follow the case through the Pima County Superior Court but their on-line docket is awful. For instance, it says "Motion for Sanctions" but it doesn't tell you which party filed the Motion and for what. None of the pleadings are accessible remotely; it just says "available at courthouse." Moreover, I'm not an Arizona attorney and I'm not familiar with their rules of civil procedure. So, mostly this is a set of educated guesses.</p><p></p><p>Arizona appears to have a robust system of mandatory discovery. What that means is that when a Complaint is filed and an Answer/Counterclaim are also filed, each party has an obligation to provide mandatory discovery, such as who are your witnesses, what documents do you have to support each contention, etc. CJP filed a Motion for Sanctions, which I am assuming is to compel responses to discovery not provided by RB and JP. There is no way to know exactly what they didn't provide without a trip to Tuscon, so you can forget about that. From the newspaper articles it seems ole Miracle Whips wouldn't cooperate with his attorney in discovery.</p><p></p><p>Here's what I do know for sure: the case is scheduled for a Mandatory Telephone Conference with the Judge on July 10th at 9:15 am (PST). We should get a few preliminary answers by then, such as whether RB and JP have retained a new attorney and whether they have complied with their discovery obligations. I'm sure CJP's attorney will be pressing hard for a date to depose (take sworn testimony under oath) of RB and JP. That will be a bloodbath when it occurs. So, we may not hear anything but crickets until after July 10th.</p><p></p><p>In the meantime, here is the bio on CJP's current attorney. He is a serious heavy hitter. If you're a nerd like me and interested, scroll all the way through his profile.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.palumbowolfe.com/attorney-profiles/scott-i-palumbo/" target="_blank">http://www.palumbowolfe.com/attorney-profiles/scott-i-palumbo/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brandon_cox, post: 430591, member: 3408"] So, I'm trying to follow the case through the Pima County Superior Court but their on-line docket is awful. For instance, it says "Motion for Sanctions" but it doesn't tell you which party filed the Motion and for what. None of the pleadings are accessible remotely; it just says "available at courthouse." Moreover, I'm not an Arizona attorney and I'm not familiar with their rules of civil procedure. So, mostly this is a set of educated guesses. Arizona appears to have a robust system of mandatory discovery. What that means is that when a Complaint is filed and an Answer/Counterclaim are also filed, each party has an obligation to provide mandatory discovery, such as who are your witnesses, what documents do you have to support each contention, etc. CJP filed a Motion for Sanctions, which I am assuming is to compel responses to discovery not provided by RB and JP. There is no way to know exactly what they didn't provide without a trip to Tuscon, so you can forget about that. From the newspaper articles it seems ole Miracle Whips wouldn't cooperate with his attorney in discovery. Here's what I do know for sure: the case is scheduled for a Mandatory Telephone Conference with the Judge on July 10th at 9:15 am (PST). We should get a few preliminary answers by then, such as whether RB and JP have retained a new attorney and whether they have complied with their discovery obligations. I'm sure CJP's attorney will be pressing hard for a date to depose (take sworn testimony under oath) of RB and JP. That will be a bloodbath when it occurs. So, we may not hear anything but crickets until after July 10th. In the meantime, here is the bio on CJP's current attorney. He is a serious heavy hitter. If you're a nerd like me and interested, scroll all the way through his profile. [URL]http://www.palumbowolfe.com/attorney-profiles/scott-i-palumbo/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Pastner cleared of Ron Bell lies
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top