Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GTRX7" data-source="post: 27387" data-attributes="member: 1045">We seem to be conflating issues here.  What is the problem?  The offense, the points scored, the completion percentage, or QB efficiency?  Beyond completion percentage, I am not sure what about the system has not been shown to work.  Our points per game are at a level very comparable to that of the Joe Hamilton era, so I don't think it has been established that the system prevents us from having a good offense or points per game.  As stated above, Washington graduated with the 3rd highest QB rating in Tech history, so I don't think the offense prevents us from having a good QB efficiency.  If the complaint is just about completion percentage (which is much less meaningful to me than those other factors (or even QB efficiency or yards per pass)), then I agree that the system is a problem.  However, so long as we are winning and scoring points, I could care less about completion percentage.  I haven't seen that as a particularly strong indicator of success.  vs UGA2008: comp. % (1-6); tot. pts. (45); tot. yds (428)2009: comp. % (6-13); tot. pts. (24); tot. yds (340)2010: comp. % (8-15); tot. pts. (34); tot. yds (512)2011: comp. % (6-17); tot. pts. (17); tot. yds (355)2012: comp. % (10-21); tot. pts. (10); tot. yds (426)2013: comp. % (11-24); tot. pts. (34); tot. yds (495)</blockquote>

Verification: As a Ramblin' Wreck from Georgia Tech, how do we drink our whiskey?