Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Our Offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 250802" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>Yes and no, imo.</p><p></p><p>Maybe there are people who really believe that GT can only compete with the triple option. I think the narrative I see more frequently is that it is <em>a way</em> we can compete more easily than were we to try and run the same thing as everyone else. So, yes, I agree that the former idea is wrong, but I think the latter idea shouldn't be dismissed so easily. I mean, I think that most agree that the scheduling suggests teams are asking for a bye or an FCS team before they play us. That suggests an implicit benefit of our offense exists.</p><p></p><p>Moreover, as I've said before, the ppd vs pwr5 data over the last 8 years has us with #6 most efficient offense. In other words, you're not going to find many coaches getting better results on O than we have. </p><p></p><p>The second point which I think needs to be made again is that the outcome of a game is dependent on more than just the offense. I just disagree with the whole logic of suggesting Gailey's offense won him as many games on average as CPJ's. I think saying Tenuta's D won as many games on average as CPJ's O might be more accurate. </p><p></p><p>Third, the data I recall is that we've been recruiting better over all under CPJ than under CCG, but I'm not going to look it up. I think the suggestion that we are recruiting worse, or that we're sacrificing in the area of personnel, seems like it's based on anecdotal assumptions which may, or may not, be right, but there's no way to verify.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 250802, member: 195"] Yes and no, imo. Maybe there are people who really believe that GT can only compete with the triple option. I think the narrative I see more frequently is that it is [I]a way[/I] we can compete more easily than were we to try and run the same thing as everyone else. So, yes, I agree that the former idea is wrong, but I think the latter idea shouldn't be dismissed so easily. I mean, I think that most agree that the scheduling suggests teams are asking for a bye or an FCS team before they play us. That suggests an implicit benefit of our offense exists. Moreover, as I've said before, the ppd vs pwr5 data over the last 8 years has us with #6 most efficient offense. In other words, you're not going to find many coaches getting better results on O than we have. The second point which I think needs to be made again is that the outcome of a game is dependent on more than just the offense. I just disagree with the whole logic of suggesting Gailey's offense won him as many games on average as CPJ's. I think saying Tenuta's D won as many games on average as CPJ's O might be more accurate. Third, the data I recall is that we've been recruiting better over all under CPJ than under CCG, but I'm not going to look it up. I think the suggestion that we are recruiting worse, or that we're sacrificing in the area of personnel, seems like it's based on anecdotal assumptions which may, or may not, be right, but there's no way to verify. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Our Offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top