Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Our Offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="InsideLB" data-source="post: 250414" data-attributes="member: 857"><p>BC from all accounts SOLD OUT to stop GT. They had offensive starters running GT's offense in the Spring. They lined up in 4 different alignments against us. IMO they way over invested resources in stopping us and it's hurt them against the rest of their schedule. Fuentes is known as an offensive guru and he has a QB who is the real deal. After losing to what looks to be a very good TN team simply because they coughed it up 5 times, VT crushed BC FIRST with Bud's defense, then with Fuentes offense. IMO VT is for real and will win the Coastal.</p><p></p><p>I am interested to see how Clemson fares vs Louisville. Could Clemson similarly have over invested trying to break their Bobby Dodd losing streak? Or were they merely that big, that fast, and that good? They looked well-coached but the thing that IMO stuck out to me (as with Iowa) is they got off blocks and ran to the football.</p><p></p><p>Now as far as GT and what GT could control vs Clemson, I thought we played very poorly. We did not respond to adversity and find a way to compete. I do think at least some of this is due to our biggest recruiting class being 2nd year guys (about 1 in 3 scholly players are 2nd year guys excluding walk-ons awarded schollies). Also our last two classes were our best, so those guys are tr-fr and 2nd year guys. Combined starts on the OL are not great. Clearly guys are learning to play the offense still and need to get bigger and stronger.</p><p></p><p>It's early. I expected a Clemson loss and we got one. I did expect a more competitive game. It's a measuring stick and I think the kids now see where they stand and what they need to do to be a ranked team. I do have faith in this group of kids. I think they are going to continue to work very, very hard as they did over the summer. I don't see them getting down or quitting. They have great character. I think our offense can roll by the end of the season if we stay relatively healthy, and do it against good defenses. Right now we aren't there. Gotta get there, gotta grind, gotta stay focused. There is nothing else do or say. I believe in this TEAM. I think they are going to get theirs before it's all said and done in 2016. Just my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="InsideLB, post: 250414, member: 857"] BC from all accounts SOLD OUT to stop GT. They had offensive starters running GT's offense in the Spring. They lined up in 4 different alignments against us. IMO they way over invested resources in stopping us and it's hurt them against the rest of their schedule. Fuentes is known as an offensive guru and he has a QB who is the real deal. After losing to what looks to be a very good TN team simply because they coughed it up 5 times, VT crushed BC FIRST with Bud's defense, then with Fuentes offense. IMO VT is for real and will win the Coastal. I am interested to see how Clemson fares vs Louisville. Could Clemson similarly have over invested trying to break their Bobby Dodd losing streak? Or were they merely that big, that fast, and that good? They looked well-coached but the thing that IMO stuck out to me (as with Iowa) is they got off blocks and ran to the football. Now as far as GT and what GT could control vs Clemson, I thought we played very poorly. We did not respond to adversity and find a way to compete. I do think at least some of this is due to our biggest recruiting class being 2nd year guys (about 1 in 3 scholly players are 2nd year guys excluding walk-ons awarded schollies). Also our last two classes were our best, so those guys are tr-fr and 2nd year guys. Combined starts on the OL are not great. Clearly guys are learning to play the offense still and need to get bigger and stronger. It's early. I expected a Clemson loss and we got one. I did expect a more competitive game. It's a measuring stick and I think the kids now see where they stand and what they need to do to be a ranked team. I do have faith in this group of kids. I think they are going to continue to work very, very hard as they did over the summer. I don't see them getting down or quitting. They have great character. I think our offense can roll by the end of the season if we stay relatively healthy, and do it against good defenses. Right now we aren't there. Gotta get there, gotta grind, gotta stay focused. There is nothing else do or say. I believe in this TEAM. I think they are going to get theirs before it's all said and done in 2016. Just my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Our Offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top