Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Option Football
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Augusta_Jacket" data-source="post: 912075" data-attributes="member: 1191"><p>My thoughts on this are it's not really going to be different no matter which offensive philosophy we choose. If we choose anything even remotely perceived as "option," we will have a stigma that will limit recruiting. That is most likely true. We will, however, likely have a scheme advantage that will keep us competitive in most games. If we choose to go NFL lite, or whatever you want to call a non-"option" offense, we will no longer have a stigma as an "option" team, but recruiting will most likely not be substantially better than it was the last 3-4 years, which, one class aside, hasn't been significantly more improved over the CPJ years. We will be competitive against most teams with similar talent and, just like if we went "option" we will likely lose to the factories routinely.</p><p></p><p>Collins was the best recruiter we've had on campus in a long time, and while he got some good athletes to commit, he wasn't exactly killing it here. If we choose to go NFL lite and recruiting, we need to ensure that there is sufficient funds to run an operation that will be attractive to recruits as well as ensuring we have high quality assistants that can develop these players.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Augusta_Jacket, post: 912075, member: 1191"] My thoughts on this are it's not really going to be different no matter which offensive philosophy we choose. If we choose anything even remotely perceived as "option," we will have a stigma that will limit recruiting. That is most likely true. We will, however, likely have a scheme advantage that will keep us competitive in most games. If we choose to go NFL lite, or whatever you want to call a non-"option" offense, we will no longer have a stigma as an "option" team, but recruiting will most likely not be substantially better than it was the last 3-4 years, which, one class aside, hasn't been significantly more improved over the CPJ years. We will be competitive against most teams with similar talent and, just like if we went "option" we will likely lose to the factories routinely. Collins was the best recruiter we've had on campus in a long time, and while he got some good athletes to commit, he wasn't exactly killing it here. If we choose to go NFL lite and recruiting, we need to ensure that there is sufficient funds to run an operation that will be attractive to recruits as well as ensuring we have high quality assistants that can develop these players. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Option Football
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top