Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Option football in the pro's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 170572" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>I understood what you were saying about the step up in D talent. I'm not sure, but I accept the premise for our discussion. </p><p></p><p>I disagree with your argument in two main ways. </p><p></p><p>First, I think you misuse the evidence from GT against elite Ds as if it's just a matter of the D and not the differential between the O and the D. We did better against better DL in 2014 than in 2009 because, in part, we had a better OL. Your analysis doesn't account for the amount of talent for run blocking OL available at the next level.</p><p></p><p>Second, your analysis suggests that our scheme is less able to adjust to greater D talent at the next level than other schemes. Yet the data at every other level shows that our scheme is the best against better talent on D.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 170572, member: 195"] I understood what you were saying about the step up in D talent. I'm not sure, but I accept the premise for our discussion. I disagree with your argument in two main ways. First, I think you misuse the evidence from GT against elite Ds as if it's just a matter of the D and not the differential between the O and the D. We did better against better DL in 2014 than in 2009 because, in part, we had a better OL. Your analysis doesn't account for the amount of talent for run blocking OL available at the next level. Second, your analysis suggests that our scheme is less able to adjust to greater D talent at the next level than other schemes. Yet the data at every other level shows that our scheme is the best against better talent on D. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Option football in the pro's
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top