- Messages
- 13,979
Our offensive scheme makes it a little tougher to analyze line play, because we pull so much.Losing Rutledge is a blow. A program like Tech does not replace him easily. OTOH, he was unknown to us fans coming in. We didn't entice him from OSU with a NIL package. If we get better play at C, which shouldn't be that hard to do given what we had there last year, and find a T or two that can allow Carney to play G which seems a better fit for him, I think the line will be at least the equivalent of last year's. But a word of caution here - I am usually optimistic about these sort of things.
Rutledge was an all American player—one of the best around. You don’t really replace him.
I kind of think of offensive lines like poker hands. We had an ace in Rutledge, but the rest of the hand didn’t fit together as well as it could have. You like to have a pair or three of a kind that you can use to get a couple of line yards. We had C-G-T of Moore/Alo-Tupuola - Rutledge - Carney. Moore and Carney were average, and Moore was better when he wasn’t at center. Alo-Tupuola was below average. We had a baller in Rutledge, but you couldn’t get behind two or three of them and pick up an easy first down. If your guard is awesome, but your center doesn’t get a good block, you have a defender penetrating. We had some good cards, but the overall hand wasn’t as good as it should have been. It showed up in Jamal Haynes’s stats—he had 4.3 yards per carry and ran the ball more than anyone other than Haynes King. He averaged 41 yards per game and Hosley averaged 54.
For NCST, Wake, Pitt, and a few other games, we couldn’t score methodical drives when we had opportunities in the opposing 40. A lot of our scores were Haynes King scampering for 15 yards, or something similar, but that dried up later in the season.
We rushed for 197 yards per game. About 80 yards of that was Haynes King. That’s something that should be icing on the cake, but instead it was the cake. Hosley, Jamal, and the backs combined for about 95, and the rest was jet sweeps from the WRs.
Both of our 2025 centers are gone. If you think that was one of our weak spots, the turnover there makes sense. To me, it looks like Key thought that the OLine wasn’t the team strength that it should have been, and he’s making some dramatic changes.
I think the OL will be different, and we’ll see stronger blocking out of the G-C-G center of the line
Although I was worried about losing Geep Wade, it looks like Key’s opinion was different, and he wanted a changeOne item not mentioned is the new coach who was an old coach Mogridge. He was involved with the line in 24, when they played better. Hopefully with him back it will lead to improved OL.