Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
OK - We now have our Dabo...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ncjacket79" data-source="post: 510445" data-attributes="member: 3199"><p>Couple of thoughts on this. First, Dabo had never been a HC or, as far as I know, a coordinator at a major program. So equating CGC with him only considers enthusiasm and your perception of his approach so no, i don't think your assumption is correct. Second, no matter what we do financially we will not spend the $$ on football that Clemson does nor will our academic requirements ever be such that we will recruit the same guys by and large. Finally if you think that "NFL style offenses" are boring i would suggest you haven't seen much NFL football. Anyone who would call the KC, LA, NO or NE offenses boring has a strange idea of what is exciting IMO. Besides what CGC said he would do would run both an offense and defense that allows players to learn and show the skills that they would use in the NFL. That includes RPO and other "option" type plays that you see every Sunday.</p><p></p><p>BTW, i love the option as well and like CPJ as a representative of Tech. However the NCAA is clearly implementing rule changes that will make our style of offense obsolete in the next few years. Every one of CPJs disciples who is coaching has made changes to the base offense that Paul never made. They see the writing on the wall in that they have to evolve to continue to use their base offense. I'm not sure Paul was interested in fighting it any longer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ncjacket79, post: 510445, member: 3199"] Couple of thoughts on this. First, Dabo had never been a HC or, as far as I know, a coordinator at a major program. So equating CGC with him only considers enthusiasm and your perception of his approach so no, i don't think your assumption is correct. Second, no matter what we do financially we will not spend the $$ on football that Clemson does nor will our academic requirements ever be such that we will recruit the same guys by and large. Finally if you think that "NFL style offenses" are boring i would suggest you haven't seen much NFL football. Anyone who would call the KC, LA, NO or NE offenses boring has a strange idea of what is exciting IMO. Besides what CGC said he would do would run both an offense and defense that allows players to learn and show the skills that they would use in the NFL. That includes RPO and other "option" type plays that you see every Sunday. BTW, i love the option as well and like CPJ as a representative of Tech. However the NCAA is clearly implementing rule changes that will make our style of offense obsolete in the next few years. Every one of CPJs disciples who is coaching has made changes to the base offense that Paul never made. They see the writing on the wall in that they have to evolve to continue to use their base offense. I'm not sure Paul was interested in fighting it any longer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
OK - We now have our Dabo...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top