Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Offensive Evolution, yea or nay?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 155802" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>Yeah, I think we may have been talking past each other, interpreting each other in keeping with how we understood the question of complexity raised by [USER=77]@dressedcheeseside[/USER]. Fwiw, I believe that his point is summarized in this post he made in response to [USER=1578]@cuttysark[/USER] saying we should be fine with "next man up," specifically Robbie being able to block after Roddy graduated etc: </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, I think that you and I might be in agreement that the experience and talent of last year allowed us to do a lot more, but I don't think it was the "much more complex" as I understood the OP's point. I also think the relative complexity of 2014 to 2012 and 2009 is more open.</p><p></p><p>Also, thanks for the clarification of your earlier post. When you said, if the "D being used," in "week 7," "also isn't great for the 50 we have repped the prior 7 weeks," that CPJ could go into the other 50, I got the impression that you had him calling plays which were largely unpracticed for the whole season. I wasn't worrying about taking the numbers you used literally as much as taking the relationship between them seriously. However many plays prepped for however many weeks, plays not prepped all season were being called. That's what I was responding to. I agree that he can call back to preparation from previous weeks. I just doubted that he'd call plays that hadn't been prepped all season.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 155802, member: 195"] Yeah, I think we may have been talking past each other, interpreting each other in keeping with how we understood the question of complexity raised by [USER=77]@dressedcheeseside[/USER]. Fwiw, I believe that his point is summarized in this post he made in response to [USER=1578]@cuttysark[/USER] saying we should be fine with "next man up," specifically Robbie being able to block after Roddy graduated etc: So, I think that you and I might be in agreement that the experience and talent of last year allowed us to do a lot more, but I don't think it was the "much more complex" as I understood the OP's point. I also think the relative complexity of 2014 to 2012 and 2009 is more open. Also, thanks for the clarification of your earlier post. When you said, if the "D being used," in "week 7," "also isn't great for the 50 we have repped the prior 7 weeks," that CPJ could go into the other 50, I got the impression that you had him calling plays which were largely unpracticed for the whole season. I wasn't worrying about taking the numbers you used literally as much as taking the relationship between them seriously. However many plays prepped for however many weeks, plays not prepped all season were being called. That's what I was responding to. I agree that he can call back to preparation from previous weeks. I just doubted that he'd call plays that hadn't been prepped all season. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Offensive Evolution, yea or nay?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top