Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
O-Line Carnage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ctcjb" data-source="post: 629456" data-attributes="member: 776"><p>As bad as the start has been to the season, I am really worried about our offense being able to score over the next 9 games. The lack of bodies on the O-Line is a MAJOR issue going forward. On Saturday's ATL chart, we had 10 linemen listed. There were 5 recruits, 2 transfers, and <strong>3</strong> walk-ons. That's our 2-deep....and now, Lee is hurt (I assume) for a while. This is bad....really bad. </p><p></p><p>As far as "quality", we have issues, too. This is not mean as a slight to anyone on our roster. I am 100% in support of EVERY kid that takes the field for Tech, but reality is reality. </p><p></p><p>Of our 5 OL <u>recruits</u> that are ATL, only Quinney even had another P5 offer. He had offers from GT, Duke, UNC, Miss St, and WF. Of course, none of the PWOs had any P5 offers. So, when you look at the 8 guys that aren't transfers, we had a grand total of <strong>FIVE P5 offers</strong>. By comparison, Casey Holman (a local GA kid that starts at LT for Duke) had 16 P5 offers. I'm not sure why, but those 16 offers did not include an offer from Tech.</p><p></p><p>Whether we run triple option, spread option, RPO, Air Raid, or something drawn up in the sand in the huddle, how will we be able to consistently get a push at the line and be able to pass protect? Because of injuries, victories from here on out may require the defense to hold the opponent to <10 pts. </p><p></p><p>The consequences of only bringing in a handful of O-Linemen over the past few years may be hard to face.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ctcjb, post: 629456, member: 776"] As bad as the start has been to the season, I am really worried about our offense being able to score over the next 9 games. The lack of bodies on the O-Line is a MAJOR issue going forward. On Saturday's ATL chart, we had 10 linemen listed. There were 5 recruits, 2 transfers, and [B]3[/B] walk-ons. That's our 2-deep....and now, Lee is hurt (I assume) for a while. This is bad....really bad. As far as "quality", we have issues, too. This is not mean as a slight to anyone on our roster. I am 100% in support of EVERY kid that takes the field for Tech, but reality is reality. Of our 5 OL [U]recruits[/U] that are ATL, only Quinney even had another P5 offer. He had offers from GT, Duke, UNC, Miss St, and WF. Of course, none of the PWOs had any P5 offers. So, when you look at the 8 guys that aren't transfers, we had a grand total of [B]FIVE P5 offers[/B]. By comparison, Casey Holman (a local GA kid that starts at LT for Duke) had 16 P5 offers. I'm not sure why, but those 16 offers did not include an offer from Tech. Whether we run triple option, spread option, RPO, Air Raid, or something drawn up in the sand in the huddle, how will we be able to consistently get a push at the line and be able to pass protect? Because of injuries, victories from here on out may require the defense to hold the opponent to <10 pts. The consequences of only bringing in a handful of O-Linemen over the past few years may be hard to face. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
O-Line Carnage
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top