Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Notre Dame - 1/13
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Connell62" data-source="post: 202574" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>Gotta get my day started, but just a few responses:</p><p></p><p>Re: Jorgy & Heath - My thought here is that BG was searching for a spark of some sort. No one was in a rythmn and BG was trying to get us to push pace to wake us up a bit. Most here aren't on the HIVE insider board, but believe me when I say that I have been beating the drum about going to MGH at point more than anyone.</p><p></p><p>I understand all of the benefits that it brings, and I hope we stay with it, but Q/Tadric has to play well for it to be effective. If they both off and Adam has an off-night by his standards, then you have try something else. Also, its not like Travis and Heath have been terrible this season from a facilitating perspective. They have gotten others involved. Sounds like it is just me, but I thought Josh did some good things down the stretch, and outside of the turn-over when we had cut it to 3, he didn't really do anything that beat us. Again, I am okay with it last night primarily because neither Q or Tadric had shown themselves as being ready last night.</p><p></p><p>RE: Lammers - BG has a tough job in determining minutes for our bigs. I agree wholeheartedly that Ben Lammers played great in the first half, but Nick really had it going offensively in the second half. Toward the end, BG was playing offense for defense with Ben and Nick. I won't argue that he deserved a few more minutes, but is that really a coaching lapse? I mean Nick scored 10 straight points for us at one stretch of the second half.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Connell62, post: 202574, member: 484"] Gotta get my day started, but just a few responses: Re: Jorgy & Heath - My thought here is that BG was searching for a spark of some sort. No one was in a rythmn and BG was trying to get us to push pace to wake us up a bit. Most here aren't on the HIVE insider board, but believe me when I say that I have been beating the drum about going to MGH at point more than anyone. I understand all of the benefits that it brings, and I hope we stay with it, but Q/Tadric has to play well for it to be effective. If they both off and Adam has an off-night by his standards, then you have try something else. Also, its not like Travis and Heath have been terrible this season from a facilitating perspective. They have gotten others involved. Sounds like it is just me, but I thought Josh did some good things down the stretch, and outside of the turn-over when we had cut it to 3, he didn't really do anything that beat us. Again, I am okay with it last night primarily because neither Q or Tadric had shown themselves as being ready last night. RE: Lammers - BG has a tough job in determining minutes for our bigs. I agree wholeheartedly that Ben Lammers played great in the first half, but Nick really had it going offensively in the second half. Toward the end, BG was playing offense for defense with Ben and Nick. I won't argue that he deserved a few more minutes, but is that really a coaching lapse? I mean Nick scored 10 straight points for us at one stretch of the second half. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Notre Dame - 1/13
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top