Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
No Slant Route - WHY?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bke1984" data-source="post: 194367" data-attributes="member: 932"><p>I'm not trying to be negative, but I think it's OK to discuss X's and O's of football. It's part of why I like it. Do I think I know more than CPJ? ...hell no...but I think it's OK to talk about the scheme and wonder whether other things would work...</p><p></p><p>To be honest, I'm not sure any scheme would have made this year's offense effective......but for arguments sake...</p><p></p><p>Our best seasons under CPJ have come when we have a credible threat to throw the football. The only time this has been the case is when we had: 1) one of the two best receivers in the NFL (in '08 and '09), or 2) two NFL caliber receivers at the same time ('14). I'm not sure Smelter was quite NFL caliber in '13 after taking so much time off from football, and Waller just wasn't there yet.</p><p></p><p>The other years we were 6-7, 8-5, 7-7, 7-6. </p><p></p><p>Were we doing anything different with our throws in '08, '09, and '14? ...I don't think so, but we just had stud receivers our there to make plays. Those guys bailed us out time after time on third and long with jump ball catches where the play had otherwise broken down....and they should have...they're NFL receivers.</p><p></p><p>But if we don't have those guys, we can get into big trouble when we are forced to throw...and I think some adjustments could be made to alleviate those issues and make our attack all the more dangerous. When we do pass, I'm just curious why we don't try to attack defenses in different ways when our offense struggles. The smoke routes are virtually gone this year...I think Jeune would be a beast on those plays. Our O line is awful at pass protecting...it seems like we could slow down pass rushes with a few more screens (to be fair, we have tried this some this year...a welcome change IMO). What about swing passes to the B-back?</p><p></p><p>Maybe it stems from having to spend so much time on the run scheme that we don't have time to add this type of stuff, but I think we could really benefit from it.</p><p></p><p>...or maybe we just need to go get another big NFL receiver. That would help, too <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bke1984, post: 194367, member: 932"] I'm not trying to be negative, but I think it's OK to discuss X's and O's of football. It's part of why I like it. Do I think I know more than CPJ? ...hell no...but I think it's OK to talk about the scheme and wonder whether other things would work... To be honest, I'm not sure any scheme would have made this year's offense effective......but for arguments sake... Our best seasons under CPJ have come when we have a credible threat to throw the football. The only time this has been the case is when we had: 1) one of the two best receivers in the NFL (in '08 and '09), or 2) two NFL caliber receivers at the same time ('14). I'm not sure Smelter was quite NFL caliber in '13 after taking so much time off from football, and Waller just wasn't there yet. The other years we were 6-7, 8-5, 7-7, 7-6. Were we doing anything different with our throws in '08, '09, and '14? ...I don't think so, but we just had stud receivers our there to make plays. Those guys bailed us out time after time on third and long with jump ball catches where the play had otherwise broken down....and they should have...they're NFL receivers. But if we don't have those guys, we can get into big trouble when we are forced to throw...and I think some adjustments could be made to alleviate those issues and make our attack all the more dangerous. When we do pass, I'm just curious why we don't try to attack defenses in different ways when our offense struggles. The smoke routes are virtually gone this year...I think Jeune would be a beast on those plays. Our O line is awful at pass protecting...it seems like we could slow down pass rushes with a few more screens (to be fair, we have tried this some this year...a welcome change IMO). What about swing passes to the B-back? Maybe it stems from having to spend so much time on the run scheme that we don't have time to add this type of stuff, but I think we could really benefit from it. ...or maybe we just need to go get another big NFL receiver. That would help, too :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
No Slant Route - WHY?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top