Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
NCAA explores compensation for names, likeness
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dtm1997" data-source="post: 579683" data-attributes="member: 572"><p>If the free market of universities says an individual isn't worth receiving anan athletic scholarship, then they're not a student athlete in the first place because they're not on scholarship.</p><p></p><p>Agreed. That's a free market activity.</p><p></p><p>My underlying stance is if individuals have earned scholarships as a student athlete, then the schools are responsible for nothing more and nothing less than a reasonably uniform coverage of the educational component.</p><p></p><p>External sources, separate from a school's monetary resources, would then compete and decide what additional value they're willing to offer in support of a scholarship earning student athlete going to the school they're supporting. It could be $0 or $1,000,000 or free pizza for 4 years.</p><p></p><p>Now that I've tried to be as clear as possible, it's also possible I misinterpreted something you said earlier. Did you say that a student athlete's scholarship funding should be reduced or eliminated in an amount commensurate with what the free market will provide them for going to a given school? That's how I interpreted your prior statement that's driving your efforts to mock me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dtm1997, post: 579683, member: 572"] If the free market of universities says an individual isn't worth receiving anan athletic scholarship, then they're not a student athlete in the first place because they're not on scholarship. Agreed. That's a free market activity. My underlying stance is if individuals have earned scholarships as a student athlete, then the schools are responsible for nothing more and nothing less than a reasonably uniform coverage of the educational component. External sources, separate from a school's monetary resources, would then compete and decide what additional value they're willing to offer in support of a scholarship earning student athlete going to the school they're supporting. It could be $0 or $1,000,000 or free pizza for 4 years. Now that I've tried to be as clear as possible, it's also possible I misinterpreted something you said earlier. Did you say that a student athlete's scholarship funding should be reduced or eliminated in an amount commensurate with what the free market will provide them for going to a given school? That's how I interpreted your prior statement that's driving your efforts to mock me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
NCAA explores compensation for names, likeness
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top