Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Nate Cottrell...just a question, nothing bad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tech_wreck47" data-source="post: 649685" data-attributes="member: 2346"><p>So I used high school film because Griffin doesn’t have much college film. I’ll also add the Cottrell is probably faster. However, besides that, they are completely different. Griffin has a true jump cut where you plant one foot in the ground and change directions. Not much slow down and it’s not a stutter step, that’s what Cottrell does (nothing wrong with that) There is vision and then there is elite vision, which are completely different. Griffin shows the ability for elite vision. He also has more power. Like I said, this is nothing against Cottrell, they are two different types of backs and that’s perfectly ok. The reason I disagree with your original statement is because imo Cottrell is not as suited for what we do on offense unless we are going to do some end around type stuff with him, wich I’d be perfectly fine with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tech_wreck47, post: 649685, member: 2346"] So I used high school film because Griffin doesn’t have much college film. I’ll also add the Cottrell is probably faster. However, besides that, they are completely different. Griffin has a true jump cut where you plant one foot in the ground and change directions. Not much slow down and it’s not a stutter step, that’s what Cottrell does (nothing wrong with that) There is vision and then there is elite vision, which are completely different. Griffin shows the ability for elite vision. He also has more power. Like I said, this is nothing against Cottrell, they are two different types of backs and that’s perfectly ok. The reason I disagree with your original statement is because imo Cottrell is not as suited for what we do on offense unless we are going to do some end around type stuff with him, wich I’d be perfectly fine with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Nate Cottrell...just a question, nothing bad
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top