Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
My Issues With Our Coaching
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scubapro" data-source="post: 251829" data-attributes="member: 744"><p>Valid points in this post. My issue with getting rid our head coach has to do with the systemic issues brought up in the previous post. Both CCG and CPJ had to vet their recruits thru the hill before they could send offers. This was the policy for the first 4 years of their tenure until they “proved” that they would recruit quality students. I suspect that there are still some of these restrictions in place. This means you can’t take many risks in recruiting in an already small pool of candidates and have to prioritize which guys you go after. CCG or I should say Tenuda set the priorities on D. While CPJ and GOL / Fridge focused on the O. I think we can be competitive in recruiting but in order to achieve this we would need to build a “Consultant Staff” like Bama with 25+ people scouring the entire country looking for the right type of student athlete. This again will cost a pile of money to start and maintain.</p><p></p><p>It’s my understanding that Tech had a huge endowment but none of it gets allocated to the GTAA. Can some confirm this?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scubapro, post: 251829, member: 744"] Valid points in this post. My issue with getting rid our head coach has to do with the systemic issues brought up in the previous post. Both CCG and CPJ had to vet their recruits thru the hill before they could send offers. This was the policy for the first 4 years of their tenure until they “proved” that they would recruit quality students. I suspect that there are still some of these restrictions in place. This means you can’t take many risks in recruiting in an already small pool of candidates and have to prioritize which guys you go after. CCG or I should say Tenuda set the priorities on D. While CPJ and GOL / Fridge focused on the O. I think we can be competitive in recruiting but in order to achieve this we would need to build a “Consultant Staff” like Bama with 25+ people scouring the entire country looking for the right type of student athlete. This again will cost a pile of money to start and maintain. It’s my understanding that Tech had a huge endowment but none of it gets allocated to the GTAA. Can some confirm this? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
My Issues With Our Coaching
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top