Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
Mutts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 952600" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>Interesting that they only backed down on two things: A count, and writing two statements as one statement. They did not back down on the minor things that the mutt's lawyers pointed out in their letter. I am sure that the mutt fans' response will be that this is proof that the entire story was a lie 'intended to bring down their dynasty'.</p><p></p><p>I am disappointed that they responded in a short (500 word?) blurb instead of a detailed refuting of the letter from the mutts, and a more detailed story about the accusations along with the audio and bodycam footage that they have. Another thing that it shows is the drop in editorial standards at news organizations now. Fifty years ago, the editors would have done this level of scrutiny to the story before it was published. Currently there are only a handful of organizations that perform to that high of a level.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 952600, member: 2426"] Interesting that they only backed down on two things: A count, and writing two statements as one statement. They did not back down on the minor things that the mutt's lawyers pointed out in their letter. I am sure that the mutt fans' response will be that this is proof that the entire story was a lie 'intended to bring down their dynasty'. I am disappointed that they responded in a short (500 word?) blurb instead of a detailed refuting of the letter from the mutts, and a more detailed story about the accusations along with the audio and bodycam footage that they have. Another thing that it shows is the drop in editorial standards at news organizations now. Fifty years ago, the editors would have done this level of scrutiny to the story before it was published. Currently there are only a handful of organizations that perform to that high of a level. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
Mutts
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top