- Messages
- 2,150
Please see the UGAg's lawyer's statement of defense for what they do during the Jan Kemp case:
This is the factory attitude. And, it was found to be illegal. What I don't get is why it's still allowed to go on in these subtle (not really) ways.
In trying to defend themselves, Georgia officials portrayed Kemp as naive about sports. “We have to compete on a level playing field,” said Fred Davison, the university president. During the Kemp civil trial, in 1986, Hale Almand, Georgia’s defense lawyer, explained the university’s patronizing aspirations for its typical less-than-scholarly athlete. “We may not make a university student out of him,” Almand told the court, “but if we can teach him to read and write, maybe he can work at the post office rather than as a garbage man when he gets through with his athletic career.” This argument backfired with the jurors: finding in favor of Kemp, they rejected her polite request for $100,000, and awarded her $2.6 million in damages instead. (This was later reduced to $1.08 million.) Jan Kemp embodied what is ostensibly the NCAA’s reason for being—to enforce standards fairly and put studies above sports—but no one from the organization ever spoke up on her behalf.
This is the factory attitude. And, it was found to be illegal. What I don't get is why it's still allowed to go on in these subtle (not really) ways.