Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Mike Greenberg tears the Georgia Bulldogs a new ***crack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="scrappy_95" data-source="post: 215787" data-attributes="member: 1205"><p>Winner...winner ...chicken dinner.</p><p></p><p>This is the key. If you promise a kid a 4-5 year scholarship and don't snatch a scholarship when something better comes along, then a more restrictive policy is not as bad (still bad but not as bad). We are in investing in you for 4-5 years regardless if you are a factor on the football field and in return you are committing to do the same for 4-5 years. Sounds like a good and sound business deal. If you are only promising a kid a 1 year scholarship at a time, then why should a coach hold all the cards. If you have the option to not renew my scholarship, I should have the equal option to leave and go anywhere I want. I still don't understand why this is a difficult concept for people to grasp and why the NCAA allows this to continue. Allow these kids the option and allow to market place to determine where these kids end up. Not talking money, but if there is a market for this kid's skills at another school and the schools is willing to pay the price for that skill with a scholarship, why shouldn't the market dictate this move instead of a false barrier put up by a coach, that should not be there in the 1st place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="scrappy_95, post: 215787, member: 1205"] Winner...winner ...chicken dinner. This is the key. If you promise a kid a 4-5 year scholarship and don't snatch a scholarship when something better comes along, then a more restrictive policy is not as bad (still bad but not as bad). We are in investing in you for 4-5 years regardless if you are a factor on the football field and in return you are committing to do the same for 4-5 years. Sounds like a good and sound business deal. If you are only promising a kid a 1 year scholarship at a time, then why should a coach hold all the cards. If you have the option to not renew my scholarship, I should have the equal option to leave and go anywhere I want. I still don't understand why this is a difficult concept for people to grasp and why the NCAA allows this to continue. Allow these kids the option and allow to market place to determine where these kids end up. Not talking money, but if there is a market for this kid's skills at another school and the schools is willing to pay the price for that skill with a scholarship, why shouldn't the market dictate this move instead of a false barrier put up by a coach, that should not be there in the 1st place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Mike Greenberg tears the Georgia Bulldogs a new ***crack
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top