Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Media Selects GT to Win Coastal; JT Picked 3rd for Preseason MVP
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Northeast Stinger" data-source="post: 162049" data-attributes="member: 1640"><p>Not sure who does not know this. </p><p></p><p>I suspect that there are multiple conversations going on here depending on who one thinks is arguing with whom. I for one am glad that Tech got picked to win things for a change. Hopefully, as CPJ said, maybe the pundits are finally going to be right for a change. Now we need to earn it.</p><p></p><p>My beef is only with those who discount the heavy losses in personnel suffered by both Clemson and FSU while magnifying the departing players for Tech and the holes that will need to be filled. To me, at least on paper, I would rather be replacing running backs and wide receivers than be replacing a quarterback or half your starting roster or an entire offensive line or most of your defense or significant coaching staff. Again, at least on paper, it is not even close to an even trade. </p><p></p><p>I get the argument that from past history of success, or having highly rated recruiting classes, some feel that Clemson and FSU will not experience much of a hurdle in maintaining high performance. But past success is never a guarantee on future performance and it just may be that Tech has finally stockpiled the kind of players who can also be the next man up. If those two points have any validity at all then Tech's roster losses are not nearly as significant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Northeast Stinger, post: 162049, member: 1640"] Not sure who does not know this. I suspect that there are multiple conversations going on here depending on who one thinks is arguing with whom. I for one am glad that Tech got picked to win things for a change. Hopefully, as CPJ said, maybe the pundits are finally going to be right for a change. Now we need to earn it. My beef is only with those who discount the heavy losses in personnel suffered by both Clemson and FSU while magnifying the departing players for Tech and the holes that will need to be filled. To me, at least on paper, I would rather be replacing running backs and wide receivers than be replacing a quarterback or half your starting roster or an entire offensive line or most of your defense or significant coaching staff. Again, at least on paper, it is not even close to an even trade. I get the argument that from past history of success, or having highly rated recruiting classes, some feel that Clemson and FSU will not experience much of a hurdle in maintaining high performance. But past success is never a guarantee on future performance and it just may be that Tech has finally stockpiled the kind of players who can also be the next man up. If those two points have any validity at all then Tech's roster losses are not nearly as significant. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Media Selects GT to Win Coastal; JT Picked 3rd for Preseason MVP
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top