Deleted member 2897
Guest
However if i think he got GT up and running he would probably leave GT for a bigger program 3-4 years down the road
Lets worry about that "problem" when we get there.
However if i think he got GT up and running he would probably leave GT for a bigger program 3-4 years down the road
Lets worry about that "problem" when we get there.
If we pay more than 1.5mil/yr for Tony Elliott then we got ripped off. The guy has never even been a full coordinator.
If we pay more than 1.5mil/yr for Tony Elliott then we got ripped off. The guy has never even been a full coordinator.
Dave Clawson will be going to a bigger program soon with the great job he's done at WFThe lowest paid coach in the ACC is Dave Clawson at WFU. He makes $1.8 million a season. I'm not interested in being a "budget" football team. That's what got us where we are today. I don't mind spending money on a coach if we believe he can do the job here. And, as @JorgeJonas pointed out, Jeff Brohm's resigning at Purdue is the new market going forward. If we want to keep up (catch up) then we need to open up our wallets.
Just watched pjs full presser. He won't even mention mbobs name, but man did he refer to him. I hope cpj can share some details about what went on between them in a few years.
And speaking of, that kinda makes me wonder about Brohm turning down his alma mater to stay with mboob @purdue.
I truly believe if we pay our next coach below 2.5 million without spending more than a million on an OC we are going to not be setting ourselves up for success.
Why is PURDUE paying twice as much for a head coach as GT?
Mboob= a person in control on a storied AD that sits in his office all day collecting checks and letting said AD rot awayWhat’s an Mboob?
Yeah they couldn't even win big time with Drew Brees - who is at least in the conversation of being one of the greatest QB's ever.It’s been a decade since Purdue won 8 games. It’s been 40 years since they won 10 games.
Well, then if Elliott was to come into consideration, we lose. He is a hot coaching property making about $900,000 at Clemson with the added enticement of bonuses bases on wins, bowls, etc. I am not saying throw $5 million at him, but $2.5-$3 million will be the competitive rate. It's called market forces. It is senseless, but football is the revenue driver for all the other non-revenue programs, including the Title IX women's sports. Then it becomes an enormous consideration: in my mind $3 million for a football coach is just crazy. But if he puts people in those seats with all the accompanying spending, and there is money for softball, volleyball, track, baseball ... then it becomes a good investment. As much as it sucks. Coaches know it and as one might expect, take advantage of it. (And you can bet anybody coming out of Clemson is going to be well-tutored in the money game by Dabo Swinney. There are those who know him who will swear that in any environment, he will be the smartest guy in the room.)If we pay more than 1.5mil/yr for Tony Elliott then we got ripped off. The guy has never even been a full coordinator.
Well, then if Elliott was to come into consideration, we lose. He is a hot coaching property making about $900,000 at Clemson with the added enticement of bonuses bases on wins, bowls, etc. I am not saying throw $5 million at him, but $2.5-$3 million will be the competitive rate. It's called market forces. It is senseless, but football is the revenue driver for all the other non-revenue programs, including the Title IX women's sports. Then it becomes an enormous consideration: in my mind $3 million for a football coach is just crazy. But if he puts people in those seats with all the accompanying spending, and there is money for softball, volleyball, track, baseball ... then it becomes a good investment. As much as it sucks. Coaches know it and as one might expect, take advantage of it. (And you can bet anybody coming out of Clemson is going to be well-tutored in the money game by Dabo Swinney. There are those who know him who will swear that in any environment, he will be the smartest guy in the room.)
If GT is so incapable of competing with the other FBS schools i think they will probably wind up in FCS in the next 10-20 yearsI agree violently. We wouldn’t even pay Satterfield that little. And he makes like $500k. All these guys would command over $2m and Tony I think would push $3m.
No they won't. If the trend continues and the same dozen or so schools are consistently the only ones making it to the final 4, I think either, 1) the rules will change dramatically to stop the inequity, or 2) they split off into their own league / entity to avoid all the rules.If GT is so incapable of competing with the other FBS schools i think they will probably wind up in FCS in the next 10-20 years
The teams in the other league after the split off will be a new version of the old D1AANo they won't. If the trend continues and the same dozen or so schools are consistently the only ones making it to the final 4, I think either, 1) the rules will change dramatically to stop the inequity, or 2) they split off into their own league / entity to avoid all the rules.
It would be foolish to give up the ACC payouts from the ESPN contract. It will only increase with the introduction of the ACC Network.No they won't. If the trend continues and the same dozen or so schools are consistently the only ones making it to the final 4, I think either, 1) the rules will change dramatically to stop the inequity, or 2) they split off into their own league / entity to avoid all the rules.