Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Lot of Paul Johnson option football on TV tonight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="forensicbuzz" data-source="post: 336500" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>Okay, I'll engage. But if you start to twist what I write like you did in my previous post, I'm going to disengage and then put you on "ignore." That's something I don't want to do because I think that you have interesting things to contribute, although you aggressive nature is off-putting to many on this board, including me.</p><p></p><p>I will start by clarifying what I said, so that we're discussing what was really said, not your reinterpretation of what I said. Navy and GT don't run the same distribution of plays. Navy runs more Triple Option than GT. Navy runs zone-blocking schemes to force the Defense in certain directions, while GT typically evaluates and then attacks the weaknesses of the Defense. Although Ken N. is a great coach, I don't think anyone would be as successful at GT as CPJ against our competition because no one knows how to adjust the way CPJ does. Anything beyond what I just reiterated is you projecting your interpretation onto me.</p><p></p><p>As for the numbers, you can find the articles as easily as I can. I agree that I think all coaches will adjust their play calling to their players, but here's the quote I quickly pulled up. Just to set the record straight:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><em>Ashley Ingram, Navy Centers and Guards Coach stated at the 2011 Navy Football Coaches Clinic that <strong>75 percent</strong> of the Flexbone Offense and 75 percent of practice time needs to be dedicated to four plays. Those four plays are <strong>Triple Option, Midline Option, Zone Dive, and Counter Option</strong>. Coach Ingram stated that the Triple Option is a play that should be run <strong>50, 60, even 70 percent of the time</strong>, and if the play is not, then something is going horribly wrong.</em></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><em></em></p><p>The 20% number for GT is probably 20-30%, but I've seen 20% in a number of articles and interviews. You can do the legwork if you'd like.</p><p></p><p>Regardless, my point is that there are differences between what Navy is doing and what GT is doing. I don't think anyone will/would be as successful as CPJ. That's my opinion based on watching him at GT the past 10 years. I'm not asking you to agree; I'm simply stating my opinion, and I don't necessarily want to get into an in depth debate defending my opinion every time I offer it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="forensicbuzz, post: 336500, member: 198"] Okay, I'll engage. But if you start to twist what I write like you did in my previous post, I'm going to disengage and then put you on "ignore." That's something I don't want to do because I think that you have interesting things to contribute, although you aggressive nature is off-putting to many on this board, including me. I will start by clarifying what I said, so that we're discussing what was really said, not your reinterpretation of what I said. Navy and GT don't run the same distribution of plays. Navy runs more Triple Option than GT. Navy runs zone-blocking schemes to force the Defense in certain directions, while GT typically evaluates and then attacks the weaknesses of the Defense. Although Ken N. is a great coach, I don't think anyone would be as successful at GT as CPJ against our competition because no one knows how to adjust the way CPJ does. Anything beyond what I just reiterated is you projecting your interpretation onto me. As for the numbers, you can find the articles as easily as I can. I agree that I think all coaches will adjust their play calling to their players, but here's the quote I quickly pulled up. Just to set the record straight: [INDENT][I]Ashley Ingram, Navy Centers and Guards Coach stated at the 2011 Navy Football Coaches Clinic that [B]75 percent[/B] of the Flexbone Offense and 75 percent of practice time needs to be dedicated to four plays. Those four plays are [B]Triple Option, Midline Option, Zone Dive, and Counter Option[/B]. Coach Ingram stated that the Triple Option is a play that should be run [B]50, 60, even 70 percent of the time[/B], and if the play is not, then something is going horribly wrong. [/I][/INDENT] The 20% number for GT is probably 20-30%, but I've seen 20% in a number of articles and interviews. You can do the legwork if you'd like. Regardless, my point is that there are differences between what Navy is doing and what GT is doing. I don't think anyone will/would be as successful as CPJ. That's my opinion based on watching him at GT the past 10 years. I'm not asking you to agree; I'm simply stating my opinion, and I don't necessarily want to get into an in depth debate defending my opinion every time I offer it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Lot of Paul Johnson option football on TV tonight
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top