Looking ahead to Pitt

Discussion in 'Georgia Tech Football' started by Eric, Oct 28, 2013.

  1. Eric

    Eric Retired Co-Founder Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,734
    As I posted in another thread this is a game that I am really worried about.

    Street and Boyd at WR could be a nightmare for us to cover.
     
  2. MGTfan

    MGTfan Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    390
    I'm not really worried about the skill of their receivers. The way I look at it, if the other team has two receivers Thomas is going to lock one of them down and Young is going to let the other one get open. Doesn't really matter who they are.
     
  3. John

    John Peacekeeper Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,898
    I'm not worried about Pitt as much as I'm worried about Georgia Tech.

    Which GT team will show up? The 0 penalty/1 turnover team we saw against Syracuse or the 97 yards of penalty/5 turnover team?

    We need to get a hold of the turnover issues. It wouldn't bug me as much if they were forced errors by the other team but we're just putting the ball on a silver platter for UVA.
     
  4. Eric

    Eric Retired Co-Founder Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,734
    I also wonder how a night game at home will factor in for us.
     
  5. poodleface

    poodleface Ramblin' Wreck

    Messages:
    208
    The crowd managed to stay hyped through the VT game, so I expect they will be a factor in this one. That said, I'm worried that Pitt is going to have a week to drill down on all of the mistakes they made defending Navy's TO and will certainly be more than adequately prepared. Pitt's 41-13 loss to FSU is looking a little better in light of FSU's annihilation of everyone else.

    At the same time, the team certainly knows that if they don't want to be known as the team to break the bowl streak, they need to beat Pitt.
     
  6. Eric

    Eric Retired Co-Founder Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,734
    I'm not sure how the players will react to a home night game...last time around it wasn't good.
     
  7. Longestday

    Longestday Helluva Engineer Featured Member

    Messages:
    2,346
    I think all teams now know our weakness and will punish us until we can stop them. Last year it was the WR screen. This year is the long pass on #8 side. I am rooting for 8 to have a good shutdown game. Also, the shallow flat routes are wide open at times.

    Stating the obvious: The offense should score enough points to win if we do not continue to shoot ourselves in the foot with TO and false starts.

    This game and no game is not an automatic.
     
  8. ATL1

    ATL1 Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    5,344
    Pitt is a big physical team the kind that can manhandle a smaller Tech in the trenches and since they just played Navy, will have some familiarity with defending the option.
     
  9. Eric

    Eric Retired Co-Founder Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,734
    Did you look at a depth chart before saying that?

    According to Pitt's rival site

    They go 245, 255, 275 and 300 up front.

    210, 215 and 220 at LB.

    180, 180, 190 and 190 at DB.
     
  10. Eric

    Eric Retired Co-Founder Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,734
    Up front they averaged 268.5 and GT averages 266 on the DL

    GT LB starting core averages 238 while Pitt's is 215

    At DB we average 190 and they average 185
     
  11. Eric

    Eric Retired Co-Founder Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,734
    We average 231 a starter while they average 222.

    So I don't think they are a big physical team that will man handle us.
     
    bat_082994 likes this.
  12. ATL1

    ATL1 Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    5,344
    2013 Roster
    Coaches
    [​IMG]
    #NAMEHT/WTPOSYRHOMETOWN/LAST SCHOOL

    78Cory King6-6/325OLRS SRStoneboro, Pa./Lakeview
    53Dorian Johnson6-5/290OLFRBelle Vernon, Pa./Belle Vernon Area
    76Ryan Schlieper6-5/310OLRS SRWexford, Pa./North Allegheny
    75Jaryd Jones-Smith6-7/295OLFRVoorhees, N.J./West Catholic (Pa.)
    74Matt Rotheram6-6/340OLRS JRNorth Olmsted, Ohio/North Olmsted
    57Artie Rowell6-2/305OLRS SOHarrisburg, Pa./Central Dauphin
    70Juantez Hollins6-5/330OLRS SRAliquippa, Pa./Aliquippa
    69Adam Bisnowaty6-6/300OLRS FRPittsburgh, Pa./Fox Chapel
    60Aaron Reese6-5/300OLFRChambersburg, Pa./Chambersburg Area
    62John Guy6-7/285OLRS FRSomerville, Mass./New Hampton School (N.H.)
    72Carson Baker6-5/280OLFRFairborn, Ohio/Fairborn
    63Alex Officer6-4/290OLFRRochester, N.Y./Eastridge
    64Shane Johnson6-5/330OLRS JRFort Washington, Md./DeMatha Catholic
    68T.J. Clemmings6-6/305OLRS JRTeaneck, N.J./Paterson Catholic
    71Gabe Roberts6-5/305OLRS FRNew London, Wis./New London
     
  13. Eric

    Eric Retired Co-Founder Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,734
    So we should be able to handle the DL they have right?
     
  14. collegeballfan

    collegeballfan Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    1,683
    Here is the Pitt depth chart:

    Offense - Starters OL
    OT 69 Adam Bisnowaty | 6-6, 275, RS FR
    OT 68 T.J. Clemmings | 6-6, 290, RS JR
    OG 78 Cory King | 6-6, 325, RS SR
    OG 74 Matt Rotheram | 6-6, 335, RS JR
    C 57 Artie Rowell | 6-2, 300, RS SO

    Defense – Starters Front 7
    DE 37 David Durham | 6-1, 245, RS JR
    DE 93 Bryan Murphy | 6-3, 255, RS JR
    DT 97 Aaron Donald | 6-0, 275, SR
    NT 50 Tyrone Ezell | 6-4, 300, RS SR
    LB 28 Anthony Gonzalez | 6-3, 210, RS JR
    LB 8 Todd Thomas | 6-2, 215, RS JR
    LB 44 Shane Gordon | 6-1, 220, RS SR

    Eric is correct, if physical size is an advantage, GT has the advantage.
    Plus the Pitt DB are 6'0 and under going against GT WR of 6'2 to 6'6.

    But as Knute Rockne proved at ND, it is the size of the heart that matters.
     

Share This Page