Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Las Vegas Mass Casualty Attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LibertyTurns" data-source="post: 406044" data-attributes="member: 789"><p>I suppose you failed to read the part about any lawful fire arm or possibly misinterpreted what it actually said. Here I provided it again:</p><p></p><p>64 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER Opinion of the Court</p><p><strong>In sum, we hold that the District’s ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful fire arm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.</strong></p><p></p><p>Prohibiting citizens from possessing lawful firearms is a violation of the 2nd Amendment. You don’t have to pull the old “I use it for hunting” alibi which is total BS by the way. The basic litmus test for whether or not you can have it is:</p><p>A. Is it a lawful firearm? </p><p>B. Is it operable for immediate self-defense?</p><p></p><p>This rules out machine guns, nuclear weapons, hand grenades, a howitzer, a javelin, etc. It does permit semi-automatic weapons that has everyone all in a lather over. Here’s a couple of ideas:</p><p></p><p>A. Why don’t we start incarcerating criminals? Take guns out of the hands of violent felons, etc. </p><p>B. Take the parts of the Youth PROMISE Act, throw out the bad parts ie ignoring juvenile criminal activity & develop the good parts, ie school vouchers, working to rebuild families, etc.</p><p>C. Investigate whether or not psychiatric drugs are a contributing factor in these people going on rampages. It appears to be at Parkland, Sandy Hook, Columbine, and many others. An extremely high percentage if you look into it. Why is there no media coverage of this- Pharmceutical companies and BIG POLITICAL donations to both sides of the aisle.</p><p></p><p>These items would actually have an impact. This other grandstanding is just politically motivated garbage & in my opinion you’re either naive or disingenuous if you believe it to be impactful. There’s plenty of places in the US where there’s strict gun laws & it has no effect other than making it more dangerous for law abiding citizens to live.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LibertyTurns, post: 406044, member: 789"] I suppose you failed to read the part about any lawful fire arm or possibly misinterpreted what it actually said. Here I provided it again: 64 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER Opinion of the Court [B]In sum, we hold that the District’s ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful fire arm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.[/B] Prohibiting citizens from possessing lawful firearms is a violation of the 2nd Amendment. You don’t have to pull the old “I use it for hunting” alibi which is total BS by the way. The basic litmus test for whether or not you can have it is: A. Is it a lawful firearm? B. Is it operable for immediate self-defense? This rules out machine guns, nuclear weapons, hand grenades, a howitzer, a javelin, etc. It does permit semi-automatic weapons that has everyone all in a lather over. Here’s a couple of ideas: A. Why don’t we start incarcerating criminals? Take guns out of the hands of violent felons, etc. B. Take the parts of the Youth PROMISE Act, throw out the bad parts ie ignoring juvenile criminal activity & develop the good parts, ie school vouchers, working to rebuild families, etc. C. Investigate whether or not psychiatric drugs are a contributing factor in these people going on rampages. It appears to be at Parkland, Sandy Hook, Columbine, and many others. An extremely high percentage if you look into it. Why is there no media coverage of this- Pharmceutical companies and BIG POLITICAL donations to both sides of the aisle. These items would actually have an impact. This other grandstanding is just politically motivated garbage & in my opinion you’re either naive or disingenuous if you believe it to be impactful. There’s plenty of places in the US where there’s strict gun laws & it has no effect other than making it more dangerous for law abiding citizens to live. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Las Vegas Mass Casualty Attack
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top